Lawbamba

Top best Class Actions Lawyers in zip code 92130 San Diego

Home   ➤ California   ➤➤ Zip- 92130 - San Diego - Class Actions

We have more than 4 top best Class Actions lawyers in zip code 92130, San Diego, California. Oleg Cross, Betty J. Santohigashi are among the top best Class Actions attorneys in zip code 92130. While choosing lawyers in zip code 92130, compare their reviews.


Oleg Cross - top best Class Actions Lawyer in zip code 92130

Oleg Cross

Rating: 5


Area of Practice: Class Actions,Securities ,White Collar Crime

Zip code: 92130, San Diego, California

Oleg Cross Avvo Reviews
We contacted Oleg to represent us in a personal injury case. Oleg was very timely with his communication and put my family at ease. Oleg was welcomi... ...

Contact: 858-720-2500
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky and Walker LLP.
3579 Valley Centre Drive.

Betty J. Santohigashi - top best Class Actions Lawyer in zip code 92130

Betty J. Santohigashi

Rating: 3.25


Area of Practice: Business ,Class Actions,Contracts,Trademarks

Zip code: 92130, San Diego, California



Contact: 858-720-8900

12275 El Camino Real   200 (Del Mar Heights).

David R. Stickney - top best Class Actions Lawyer in zip code 92130

David R. Stickney

Area of Practice: Civil ,Class Actions,Securities

Zip code: 92130, San Diego, California



Contact: 858-793-0070
Bernstein Litowitz Berger and Grossmann LLP.
12481 High Bluff Drive   300  9.

Benjamin Galdston - top best Class Actions Lawyer in zip code 92130

Benjamin Galdston

Rating: 3.25


Area of Practice: Class Actions,Securities

Zip code: 92130, San Diego, California



Contact: 858-793-0070
Bernstein Litowitz Berger and Grossmann LLP.
12481 High Bluff Drive   300  9.

FAQs - Class Actions Attorneys in 92130

Class Actions Case examples in zip code 92130

Description: Involves class action lawsuits related to antitrust violations, focusing on collective claims for market manipulation. Case Example: In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, 2015 - Addressed class action claims for anti-competitive practices in employment. Judgment: The court awarded damages to the class based on antitrust violations.