Lawbamba

Top best Franchise Lawyers in zip code 92612 Irvine

Home   ➤ California   ➤➤ Zip- 92612 - Irvine - Franchise

We have more than 3 top best Franchise lawyers in zip code 92612, Irvine, California. Robert J. Feldhake, Richard B. Specter are among the top best Franchise attorneys in zip code 92612. While choosing lawyers in zip code 92612, compare their reviews.


Robert J. Feldhake - top best Franchise Lawyer in zip code 92612

Robert J. Feldhake

Rating: 3.45


Area of Practice: Administrative ,Antitrust & Trade Regulation,Asbestos ,Civil Rights,Communications & Media ,Constitutional ,Contracts,Criminal Defense ,Discrimination,Drugs & Medical Devices,Education ,Elder ,Employment & Labor ,Energy ,Entertainment & Sports ,Estate Planning,Franchise ,Health Care & Hospitalization,Insurance ,Landlord & Tenant,Legal Malpractice,Natural Resources,Nursing Home Negligence,Products Liability,Professional Malpractice,Securities ,Sexual Harassment,Toxic Substances,Trademarks

Zip code: 92612, Irvine, California



Contact: (949) 553-5000
Feldhake Roquemore LLP.
19900 MacArthur Boulevard   Newport Gateway Tower .

Richard B. Specter - top best Franchise Lawyer in zip code 92612

Richard B. Specter

Rating: 3.75


Area of Practice: Business ,Civil ,Entertainment & Sports ,Franchise

Zip code: 92612, Irvine, California



Contact: 949-553-9266
Corbett, Steelman and Specter, A Professional Law Corporation.
18200 Von Karman Avenue   900  .

David F. Brown - top best Franchise Lawyer in zip code 92612

David F. Brown

Rating: 3.35


Area of Practice: Business & Commercial,Corporate ,Franchise ,Landlord & Tenant,Professional Malpractice,Real Estate ,Trademarks

Zip code: 92612, Irvine, California



Contact: 949-553-9266
Corbett, Steelman and Specter, A Professional Law Corporation.
18200 Von Karman Avenue   900  .

Top best Franchise lawyers in Irvine Description: Legal issues related to the operation and regulation of automotive franchises and dealerships. Case Example: In Smith v. Franchise Owner (2020), the case involved disputes over dealership practices. Judgment: The court ruled on compliance with franchise regulations.