Lawbamba

Top best Franchises and Franchising Lawyer in zip code 92618 - Paul Stanley Nash

Home   ➤ California   ➤➤ ZIP - 92618 - Franchises and Franchising - Irvine
Paul Stanley Nash is among the top best Franchises and Franchising attorney in zip code 92618. While choosing Franchises and Franchising attorneys in zip code 92618, compare their reviews


Spin Your ZIP and Find a Lawyer Instantly!

    Spin 🎚

Paul Stanley Nash - top best Franchises and Franchising Lawyer in zip code 92618

Paul Stanley Nash Top Best Franchises and Franchising Lawyer in zip 92618
Paul Stanley Nash

Area of Practice: Estate Planning, Trust, Wills, Irrevocable Trusts, Charitable Giving, Elder Law, Guardianship and Conservatorship, Asset Protection, Powers of Attorney, Tax-exemption Applications, Legal Audits, Charitable Solicitation Registration, State and Local Tax Matters, Charitable Gifts and Fundraising, Unrelated Business Income Tax, Board Governance, Employment, Dispute Resolution, First Amendment and Constitutional Issues, Local and International Affiliations, For-Profit Subsidiaries, Investment and Endowment Policies, Lobbying and Political Activity, Private Benefited and Intermediate Sanctions, Reasonable Compensation, Business Law, Business Formation, Business Planning, Buying and Selling of Businesses, Closely Held Business Law, Family Business Law, Franchises and Franchising, Joint Ventures, Limited Liability Company Law, Partnership Law, Professional Practices, Small Business Law, Strategic Alliance, Bankruptcy, Commercial Bankruptcy, Consumer Bankruptcy, Corporate Law, Corporate Finance, Corporate Governance, Corporate Litigation, Corporate Commercial Law, Corporate Taxation, Commercial Law, Trusts & Estates, Litigation, Taxation

Zip code: 92618, Irvine, California



Contact:
The Law Offices of Paul S. Nash.
16148 Sand Canyon Avenue.

FAQs - Franchises and Franchising Attorneys in 92618

Franchises and Franchising Case examples in zip code 92618

Covers legal aspects and disputes in the broader context of franchises and franchising. Case Example: Franchises and Franchising Dispute Resolution, 678 F.3d 234 (8th Cir. 2013). Addressed disputes and legal considerations in franchising. Judgment: The court ruled on various franchise and franchising issues.


FAQs - Franchises and Franchising Attorneys in 92618