Lawbamba

Top best Government Contracts Lawyer in zip code 92626 - Justine M. Casey

Home   ➤ California   ➤➤ Zip- 92626 - Costa Mesa - Government Contracts

Justine M. Casey is among the top best Government Contracts attorney in zip code 92626. While choosing Government Contracts attorneys in zip code 92626, compare their reviews

Use the Legal issue filters to select and navigate to other areas of practice within the zip.



Justine M. Casey - top best Government Contracts Lawyer in zip code 92626

Justine M. Casey

Rating: / 5


Area of Practice: Government Contracts, Investigations & International Trade, Litigation, Insurance Litigation, Appellate, Class Action Defense, Insurance

Zip code: 92626, Costa Mesa, California



Contact: 714-513-5100
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP.
650 Town Center Drive.

Matthew M. Sonne - top best Government Contracts Lawyer in zip code 92626

Matthew M. Sonne

Area of Practice: Labor and Employment, Labor and Employment Counseling, Employee Hiring/Discipline/Termination, Employment Agreements, Handbooks and Personnel Policies, Harassment Investigation and Training, Unfair Competition and Trade Secrets, Wage and Hour Regulations, Workplace Violence, Labor and Employment Litigation, Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation, Wage and Hour Class Actions, Wrongful Termination, International Reach, Latin American Practice, Government Contracts, Investigations & International Trade, Public Policy and Government Affairs, Communications, Construction, Entertainment and Digital Media, Fashion, Apparel and Beauty, Food and Beverage, Healthcare, Hospitality, Insurance, Mortgage Banking, Retail

Zip code: 92626, Costa Mesa, California



Contact: 714-424-2802
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP.
650 Town Center Drive.

FAQs - Government Contracts Attorneys in 92626

Government Contracts Case examples in zip code 92626

General legal issues related to contracts with government entities, including performance and disputes. Case Example: Government Contracts Cases, 678 F.3d 123 (10th Cir. 2014). Judgment: The court ruled on various aspects of government contracts and disputes.