Lawbamba

Top best Copyrights Lawyers in zip code 94086 Sunnyvale

Home   ➤ California   ➤➤ Zip- 94086 - Sunnyvale - Copyrights

We have more than 4 top best Copyrights lawyers in zip code 94086, Sunnyvale, California. Monica Zent, Todd M. Gascon are among the top best Copyrights attorneys in zip code 94086. While choosing lawyers in zip code 94086, compare their reviews.


Monica Zent - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 94086

Monica Zent

Rating: 5


Area of Practice: Business & Commercial,Contracts,Copyrights,Corporate ,Entertainment & Sports ,Intellectual Property ,Internet

Zip code: 94086, Sunnyvale, California

Monica Zent Avvo Reviews
So glad that I was introduced to Monica. We had an intellectual property issue regarding a squatter who hijacked our domain name and was violating our... ...

Contact: 866-zentlaw

1298 Kifer Road   509.

Todd M. Gascon - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 94086

Todd M. Gascon

Area of Practice: Business & Commercial,Contracts,Copyrights,Entertainment & Sports ,Internet

Zip code: 94086, Sunnyvale, California



Contact: 866-zentlaw
Zent Law Group, PC.
1298 Kifer Road   509.

Lucas J. Myslinski - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 94086

Lucas J. Myslinski

Area of Practice: Copyrights,Intellectual Property ,Patents,Trademarks

Zip code: 94086, Sunnyvale, California



Contact: 408-530-9700
Haverstock and Owens, L.L.P..
162 North Wolfe Road.

Joseph R. Weatherbee - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 94086

Joseph R. Weatherbee

Area of Practice: Copyrights,Intellectual Property ,Patents,Trademarks

Zip code: 94086, Sunnyvale, California



Contact: 408-530-9700
Haverstock and Owens, L.L.P..
162 North Wolfe Road.

FAQs - Copyrights Attorneys in 94086

Copyrights Case examples in zip code 94086

Description: General legal rights granted to creators of original works, including the exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, and perform their work. Case Example: Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (1984) - Dispute over the legality of home video recording. Judgment: Court ruled that home recording for private use did not infringe copyrights.