Lawbamba

Top best Consumer Protection Lawyers in zip code 94559 Napa

Home   ➤ California   ➤➤ Zip- 94559 - Napa - Consumer Protection

We have more than 4 top best Consumer Protection lawyers in zip code 94559, Napa, California. D.S. Berenson, Douglas A. Rubel are among the top best Consumer Protection attorneys in zip code 94559. While choosing lawyers in zip code 94559, compare their reviews.


D.S. Berenson - top best Consumer Protection Lawyer in zip code 94559

D.S. Berenson

Area of Practice: Banking & Finance,Business & Commercial,Construction ,Consumer Protection,Corporate ,International & Trade,Mergers & Acquisitions,Securities

Zip code: 94559, Napa, California



Contact: 707-226-8997

Second Street.

Douglas A. Rubel - top best Consumer Protection Lawyer in zip code 94559

Douglas A. Rubel

Area of Practice: Business ,Civil ,Class Actions,Construction ,Consumer Protection,Corporate ,Employee Benefits,ERISA

Zip code: 94559, Napa, California



Contact: 707-226-8997

Second Street.

Bruce A. Miroglio - top best Consumer Protection Lawyer in zip code 94559

Bruce A. Miroglio

Rating: 3.85


Area of Practice: Administrative ,Agricultural ,Animal Bites,Antitrust & Trade Regulation,Assault & Battery,Bankruptcy,Civil Rights,Constitutional ,Consumer Protection,Criminal Defense ,Employment & Labor ,Labor ,Medical Malpractice,Motor Vehicle Accidents,Personal Injury,Premises Liability,Products Liability,Professional Malpractice,Sexual Harassment,Wrongful Death

Zip code: 94559, Napa, California



Contact: (707) 252-9000
Gaw Van Male.
Main Street.

Sabrina Sarah Wolfson - top best Consumer Protection Lawyer in zip code 94559

Sabrina Sarah Wolfson

Area of Practice: Consumer Protection

Zip code: 94559, Napa, California



Contact: 707-257-9516

955 School St, City Of Napa.

count 4 Top best Consumer Protection lawyers in Napa

Legal matters involving protection of consumers in business transactions. Case Example: Doe v. Business (2019) - Dispute over consumer rights and business practices. Judgment: The court ruled in favor of consumer protection claims and awarded damages.