Lawbamba

Top best Products Liability Lawyer in zip code 95204 - Lawrence M. Knapp

Home   ➤ California   ➤➤ Zip- 95204 - Stockton - Products Liability

Lawrence M. Knapp is among the top best Products Liability attorney in zip code 95204. While choosing Products Liability attorneys in zip code 95204, compare their reviews

Use the Legal issue filters to select and navigate to other areas of practice within the zip.



Lawrence M. Knapp - top best Products Liability Lawyer in zip code 95204

Lawrence M. Knapp

Rating: 5


Area of Practice: Animal Bites,Asbestos ,Assault & Battery,Drugs & Medical Devices,Elder ,Environmental ,Estate Planning,Health Care & Hospitalization,Insurance ,Legal Malpractice,Medical Malpractice,Motor Vehicle Accidents,Motor Vehicle Defects,Nursing Home Negligence,Personal Injury,Premises Liability,Products Liability,Professional Malpractice,Toxic Substances,Wrongful Death

Zip code: 95204, Stockton, California

Lawrence M. Knapp Avvo Reviews
Staff was friendly, I couldn't have found a more professional group to represent me in regards to my auto accident. I was extremely satisfied with t... ...

Contact: (209) 946-4440
Law Offices of Lawrence M. Knapp.
250 Dorris Pl.

K. Robert Foster - top best Products Liability Lawyer in zip code 95204

K. Robert Foster

Rating: 1


Area of Practice: Drugs & Medical Devices,Environmental ,Estate Planning,Probate ,Products Liability,Toxic Substances,Trusts,Wills

Zip code: 95204, Stockton, California

K. Robert Foster Avvo Reviews
I sought ther services of this attorney and would not reccomend him ever. I paid him a one thousane dollar retainer and for my money Foster drove to ... ...

Contact: (209) 464-1100
Law Office of K. Robert Foster.
2600 Pacific Avenue.

FAQs - Products Liability Attorneys in 95204

Products Liability Case examples in zip code 95204

Description: Deals with claims related to defects in ATVs, including design and manufacturing flaws. Case Example: Davis v. Polaris Industries, Inc., 2020 - Focused on product liability claims for defective ATVs. Judgment: The court awarded damages for injuries caused by the defective ATV.