Lawbamba

Top best Marital Property Law Lawyer in zip code 95825 - Fredrick S. (Rick) Cohen

Home   ➤ California   ➤➤ Zip- 95825 - Sacramento - Marital Property Law

Fredrick S. (Rick) Cohen is among the top best Marital Property Law attorney in zip code 95825. While choosing Marital Property Law attorneys in zip code 95825, compare their reviews

Use the Legal issue filters to select and navigate to other areas of practice within the zip.



Fredrick S. (Rick) Cohen - top best Marital Property Law Lawyer in zip code 95825

Fredrick S. (Rick) Cohen

Rating: / 4.5


Area of Practice: Family Law, Divorce, Child Custody, Child Support, Spousal Support, Paternity, Arbitration, Alimony, Annulment, Child Abduction, Child Abuse and Neglect, Child Advocacy, Child Care, Child Custody Mediation, Child Protection, Cohabitation Agreements, Community Property Law, Domestic Partnerships, Domestic Violence, Equitable Distribution, Fathers Rights, Gay and Lesbian Family Law, Grandparents Custody, Grandparents Visitation Rights, International Child Custody, International Family Law, Interstate Child Custody, Interstate Support, Legal Separation, Marital Agreements, Marital Property Distribution, Marital Property Law, Marital Property Settlements, Military Divorce, Name Changes, No Fault Divorce, Palimony, Parental Rights, Parenting Time, Post Divorce Modification, Post Nuptial Agreements, Premarital Agreements, Qualified Domestic Relations Orders QDROs, Restraining Orders, Same Sex Marriage, Step Parent Adoptions, Termination of Parental Rights, Third Party Custody, Uncontested Divorce, Visitation Rights

Zip code: 95825, Sacramento, California



Contact: 916-925-7177
Law Offices of Fredrick S. Cohen.
2020 Hurley Way.

FAQs - Marital Property Law Attorneys in 95825

Marital Property Law Case examples in zip code 95825

Legal principles governing the ownership and distribution of marital property. In re: Marriage of Scott, 858 N.E.2d 823 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). Case Example: The court addressed issues related to the classification and division of marital property. Judgment: The court ruled in favor of a fair distribution based on marital contributions.