Lawbamba

Top best Natural Resources Lawyers in zip code 95864 Sacramento

Home   ➤ California   ➤➤ Zip- 95864 - Sacramento - Natural Resources

We have more than 5 top best Natural Resources lawyers in zip code 95864, Sacramento, California. Julie A. Carter, Sean B. Murphy are among the top best Natural Resources attorneys in zip code 95864. While choosing lawyers in zip code 95864, compare their reviews.


Julie A. Carter - top best Natural Resources Lawyer in zip code 95864

Julie A. Carter

Area of Practice: Civil ,Natural Resources

Zip code: 95864, Sacramento, California



Contact: 916-570-2500
Day Carter and Murphy, LLP.
3620 American River Drive   205.

Sean B. Murphy - top best Natural Resources Lawyer in zip code 95864

Sean B. Murphy

Rating: 3.25


Area of Practice: Natural Resources

Zip code: 95864, Sacramento, California



Contact: 916-570-2500
Day Carter and Murphy, LLP.
3620 American River Drive   205.

Ann L. Trowbridge - top best Natural Resources Lawyer in zip code 95864

Ann L. Trowbridge

Rating: 3.35


Area of Practice: Energy ,Environmental ,Natural Resources

Zip code: 95864, Sacramento, California



Contact: 916-570-2500
Day Carter and Murphy, LLP.
3620 American River Drive   205.

Tracy K. Hunckler - top best Natural Resources Lawyer in zip code 95864

Tracy K. Hunckler

Rating: 3.35


Area of Practice: Civil ,Energy ,Natural Resources

Zip code: 95864, Sacramento, California



Contact: 916-570-2500
Day Carter and Murphy, LLP.
3620 American River Drive   205.

Joshua L. Baker - top best Natural Resources Lawyer in zip code 95864

Joshua L. Baker

Area of Practice: Natural Resources

Zip code: 95864, Sacramento, California



Contact: 916-570-2500
Day Carter and Murphy, LLP.
3620 American River Drive   205.

FAQs - Natural Resources Attorneys in 95864

Natural Resources Case examples in zip code 95864

Description: Legal issues concerning the extraction and management of natural resources, including oil, gas, and minerals. Case Example: Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon (1922) - This landmark case addressed the regulation of mining activities and property rights. Judgment: The Supreme Court held that regulation could go too far and become a taking under the Fifth Amendment, requiring compensation.