Lawbamba
Login

Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation Lawyer in zip code 97401 | 2 Available

Amanda M. Walkup is among the available Noncompetition and NonSolicitation attorney in zip code 97401. While choosing Noncompetition and NonSolicitation attorneys in zip code 97401, compare their reviews.
🎚

Amanda M. Walkup - Noncompetition and NonSolicitation Lawyer in zip code 97401

zipcode 97401 Noncompetition and NonSolicitation Lawyer - Amanda M. Walkup
Amanda M. Walkup

Ratings:
Lawyers.com Rating: Rated 4.6 out of 5



Area of Practice: Labor and Employment, Confidentiality Agreements, Covenants Not To Compete, Employee Leasing, Employee Rights, Employment Breach of Contract, Employment Civil Rights, Employment Claims, Employment Contracts, Employment Defense, Employment Discrimination, Employment Law, Employment Litigation, Employment Mediation, Employment Termination, Executive Employment Law, Executive Severance Contracts, Fair Employment Practices, Fair Labor Standards, Family and Medical Leave Act, Harassment, Human Resources Law, Management Employment Law, Noncompete Litigation, Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation, Personnel Policies, Personnel Training, Reductions in Force, Restrictive Covenants, Sexual Harassment, Title VII Discrimination, Wage and Hour Law, WARN Act, Wrongful Termination Defense, Civil Litigation, Defense Litigation, Federal Civil Litigation, Federal Litigation

Zip code: 97401, Eugene, Oregon



Contact:
Hershner Hunter, LLP.
180 East 11th Avenue.

Mario Conte - Noncompetition and NonSolicitation Lawyer in zip code 97401

zipcode 97401 Noncompetition and NonSolicitation Lawyer - Mario Conte
Mario Conte


Area of Practice: Business Litigation, Mediation, Arbitration, Civil Appeals, Banks and Banking, Bank Collections, Bank Foreclosures, Banking Litigation, Business Arbitration, Business Torts, Complex Business Litigation, Federal Civil Practice, Discrimination, Collections, Commercial Collections, Garnishments, Post Judgment Collections, Secured Collections, Unsecured Collections, Commercial Arbitration, Commercial Litigation, Commercial Mediation, Commercial Torts, Complex Commercial Litigation, Commercial Real Estate Foreclosure, Commercial Real Estate Litigation, Construction Arbitration, Construction Claims, Construction Liability, Construction Liens, Construction Litigation, Construction Mediation, Breach of Contract, Contract Litigation, Corporate Litigation, Civil Fraud, Age Discrimination in Employment, Covenants Not To Compete, Employer Liability, Employment Claims, Employment Defense, Employment Disability Discrimination, Employment Discrimination, Employment Litigation, Employment Mediation, Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation, Retaliatory Discharge, Whistleblower Litigation, Wrongful Termination, Wrongful Termination Defense, Evictions, Unlawful Detainer, Civil Litigation, Complex Litigation, Defense Litigation, Federal Civil Litigation, Federal Litigation, Trial Practice, Adverse Possession, Boundary Disputes, Quiet Title, Real Estate Arbitration, Real Estate Litigation, Real Estate Mediation, Civil Liability

Zip code: 97401, Eugene, Oregon



Contact:
Hershner Hunter, LLP.
180 East 11th Avenue.

Save this search to MyLawbamba
Share this Listing

No Q&As yet near 97401 (Noncompetition and NonSolicitation)

Be the first to ask Lawbamba Community. Real Local lawyers answer.

Noncompetition and NonSolicitation
97401
Open full form

By posting, you agree this is general information, not legal advice.

Selecting a Noncompetition and NonSolicitation Attorney in 97401

No Q&As yet near 97401 (Noncompetition and NonSolicitation)

Be the first to ask Lawbamba Community. Real Local lawyers answer.

Noncompetition and NonSolicitation
97401
Open full form

By posting, you agree this is general information, not legal advice.

Selecting a Noncompetition and NonSolicitation Attorney in 97401


Noncompetition and NonSolicitation Case examples in zip code 97401

Legal issues involving noncompetition and non-solicitation clauses in contracts. Case Example: Smith v. Service Corp., 2020 WL 5678901 (N.D. Cal. 2020) ?he court reviewed a case involving both noncompetition and non-solicitation clauses. Judgment: The court ruled in favor of Service Corp., enforcing both clauses against the former employee.