Janet Pulliam Lawyer Reviews & Ratings - Little Rock
Janet L. Pulliam has thirty years of experience in the areas of labor and employment law, health law, commercial litigation, and education law. While she often appears in cases in the state courts of Arkansas, most of her litigation experience has been in the federal district and appellate courts.. She is a member of the peer-selected American Board of Trial Advocates and is listed in Best Lawyers in America under Labor and Employment Law; in Chambers USA as a "Leader" in the field of Labor & Employment; and in Mid-South Super Lawyers in the areas of Health Care, Employment Litigation: Defense and Business Litigation.. She regularly advises and litigates in areas affecting public policy. Presently, her concentration is in the health law industry. She was selected by Super Lawyers as one of the most outstanding attorneys in the Mid-South in the area of Health Care Law for 2008-2011. Janet provides a range of services to health care providers, assisting them with employment issues, commercial disputes, governmental claims, civil and criminal investigations, and peer review.. Janet also serves as general counsel for the Little Rock Cardiology Clinic, where she is involved in general advice and litigation in emerging health care issues, including specialty hospitals, physician ownership and referral, economic credentialing, pay for performance, and antitrust. She served on the Institutional Review Board of Arkansas Heart Hospital from its inception in 1996 to 2007.. Recently, she was lead counsel securing significant victory for Mississippi County hospitals. On June 1, 2011, Judge Brian Miller of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas ruled in favor of the local community hospitals and found as a matter of law that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) interest in Medicare overpayment has priority over a lender's (First Tennessee Bank) security interest in receivables. While not binding, this opinion provides clarity to rural hospital systems across the country regarding Medicare overpayment disputes. Judge Miller ruled: "Although First Tennessee has a valid security interest in (certain) accounts, that interest does not attach until CMS audits and finalizes payments after each fiscal year." Farmers v. Ameris, et. al. No. 3:10CV00173-BSM(E.D.).. From 2004-2008, Janet acted as lead trial counsel in Murphy et al. v. Baptist Health; Pulaski County Circuit Court No. CV 2004-2002. In Murphy, et al., a group of cardiologists she represents, prevailed in obtaining a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of Baptist Hospital's economic credentialing policy. The preliminary injunction was sustained by the Arkansas Supreme Court. Baptist Health v. Murphy, 365 Ark. 115, 226 S.W.3d 800 (2006). Subsequently, a final judgment was entered for the Murphy plaintiffs, granting a permanent injunction. Or. Granting Murphy Pl.’s Mot. Perm. Inj. (Feb. 27, 2009), Murphy, et al v. Baptist Health No. CV 2004-2002 (Pulaski County Ark. 13th Div.). Janet argued the appeal successfully. Baptist Health v. Murphy, 2010 Ark. 358; 2010 Ark. LEXIS 458, September 30, 2010, Opinion Delivered. She was also involved in litigation involving the Patient Protection Act (Any Willing Provider Law) St. Vincent Infirmary Medical Center, et al. v. Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Pulaski County Circuit Court No. CV 2006-4935.. She is member of ABA Health Law Section and The American Health Law Lawyers Association. She is an active member of the ABA and participates in several sub-committees relevant to her practice and serves as vice-chair of the Health Sections’ interest group on employee benefits and highly compensated employees.. Recent work with providers has included analysis of the value and possibilities of Hospital Syndications and assisting providers in converting to Electronic Medical Records.. Janet has acted as lead trial counsel representing both individuals and employers in class action employment matters and voting rights cases. See, e.g., Perkins v. City of West Helena, 675 F.2nd 2000 (8th Cir. 1982).. In the area of Education law, Janet has represented school districts, teachers, and students in a myriad of matters, and has assisted in the creation and design of student choice and student assignment plans in Illinois, Florida, and Massachusetts. In the litigation area, she was one of four lead attorneys representing the Little Rock School District seeking an inter-district remedy in a school desegregation case. This was one of the few successful inter-district remedy cases post-Milliken. Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, 738 F.2d 82 (8th Cir. 1984), 778 F.2d 404 (en banc), cert. denied, 106 S. Ct. 2926 (1986).. In 1995, Janet was appointed by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois to serve as legal assistant to the Special Master in the remedy phase of a school desegregation case. She served in that role until the case was concluded in 2002. People Who Care v. Rockford Board of Education School District #205, 111 F.3d 528 (7th Cir. 1997).. Also in 1995, she was appointed by the Governor of Arkansas to serve as Special Justice for the Arkansas Supreme Court.. In 2002, she took a sabbatical from private practice to serve as a senior law clerk for United States District Court Judge Billy Roy Wilson, Jr.. In 1994, she successfully represented a class of hearing-impaired persons in obtaining a ruling that the state statute barring hearing-impaired individuals from jury service was in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. After class certification, the State admitted liability, and the case was resolved by consent decree. Quinn v. Bogard, No. 93-CV-552 (E.D. Ark. 1993).. Janet received a B.A. degree from the University of Arkansas in 1969, and a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Arkansas School of Law in 1979. She currently serves as an adjunct professor at the University of Arkansas, Bowen School of Law.
Total Reviews 5
Janet Pulliam
Counties Little Rock , Pulaski , Pulaski , Pulaski , Pulaski County
72201 Arkansas State lawyer US Not Available
Are you Janet Pulliam or Client ? Claim this listing or Submit a review
Save Lawyer to Mylawbamba
Quick Summary Information for lawyer Janet Pulliam on Lawbamba
- Free or Complimentary consultation may be available for a few hours.
- Little Rock Lawyers Fees is generally in the range of $251-$355 per hour.
Compare Janet Pulliam's Avvo and Yelp Reviews wth other lawyers in zip 72201
Employment lawyers
Health Care lawyers
Litigation lawyers
Education lawyers
How Can I Contact Lawyer Janet Pulliam for Legal Advice?
Here are a few tips to break the ice once you have chosen your lawyers:
- How many years have you been in practice?
- How many Employment similair cases like mine have you handled?
- How often do you settle Employment cases out of court?
- What is your fees and the estimated cost of my specific case?
- Does lawyer Janet Pulliam offer any Pro bono services?
- What are my next steps to proceed?
Explore more Employment Lawyers in ZIP Codes Nearby 72201
Brentwood, Tennessee (ZIP 37027) - 321.5 miles away
Louisville, Kentucky (ZIP 40203) - 435.1 miles away
Louisville, Kentucky (ZIP 40202) - 435.9 miles away
Indianapolis, Indiana (ZIP 46204) - 483.4 miles away
Indianapolis, Indiana (ZIP 46202) - 483.8 miles away
Indianapolis, Indiana (ZIP 46280) - 492.9 miles away
Westfield, Indiana (ZIP 46074) - 495.7 miles away
Chicago, Illinois (ZIP 60605) - 552.8 miles away
Chicago, Illinois (ZIP 60606) - 553.3 miles away
Chicago, Illinois (ZIP 60603) - 553.5 miles away
Which Lawyers in Little Rock Are Rated Higher than Janet Pulliam?
Judson Kidd
Reviews
D him previously that I would not accept. He seemed completely unaware of filings that the opposing ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Thomas Travis
Reviews
We hired him to help get my husband legel 3 yrs ago we paid $3000 I've called him several times in l ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Theodis Thompson
Reviews
Is office. It is now a month later and I haven't gotten so much as a phone call, email, or any corre ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Floyd Alford Healy
Reviews
I had the same issue and believe my case was not handled by him in my favor. He didn't present any evidence given on my behalf and seem to have bargai... ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Ginger McDonald
Reviews
Or me to sign, but as I was reading over them, I noticed several glaring errors. She told me to go ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Mark Sexton
Reviews
E deductions from my account! They have me on tape authorizing them to take the deductions but they ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Holt Short
Reviews
Holt Short was NOT helpful in my case. I brought him ALL evidence to view and he looked at 1 folder ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Brian Wilson
Reviews
Y mistake. Waylan has lied several times about filing an amendment to remove my home from the person ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.00/5
Suzanne Lumpkin
Reviews
Ows misinformation to be entered in records. She dropped my case after I mentioned contacting Arkans ...read more from avvo
Avvo Rating 1.30/5