Top best Investment Fraud Lawyers in Boston | 36 available

36 Investment Fraud lawyers are available in Boston, Massachusetts. These lawyers are rated between /5 to /5 and 51% provide free consultation with fees ranging from $42 to $60 per hour.

Active Lawyers

21 - 36

Hourly Fees

$201 - $415

Free Consultations

42% - 60%


36 Investment Fraud Lawyers Found Near You

Lawyers Rating: Rated 4.4 out of 5

Location: Boston 02109

Doug is responsible for the compliance program for a national real estate private equity company in Boston. Doug is a Investment Adviser Certified Compliance Professional® (IACCP®). Doug does not accept clients.. Previously, he was a senior attorney in Goodwin Procter's Real Estate Group, helping clients invest in real estate through a variety of investment vehicles. In addition to his real estate practice, Doug was a member of Goodwin Procter's Knowledge Management Department.. You can find Doug online at:. Compliance Building, a blog on compliance and business ethics.. And also:

Lawyers Rating: Rated 4.1 out of 5

Location: Boston 02110
Firm: Block & Leviton LLP

Among other cases, Jake Walker is currently the lead associate in In re EZCORP Securities Litigation (W.D. Tex.), and Budde v. Global Power Equipment Inc., (N.D. Tex.), both federal securities fraud class actions involving accounting restatements and financial misrepresentations. Jake served as a lead associate in In re Atossa Genetics, Inc., and In re Amicus Therapeutics Securities Litigation (D. N.J.), both securities fraud class actions concerning misrepresentations made to investors about the companies’ interactions with the Food and Drug Administration. Both Atossa and Amicus resulted in favorable settlements for shareholder class members. Jake has also worked on litigation involving the private equity-buyout of a health and fitness chain with substantial real estate assets, In re Lifetime Fitness Shareholder Litigation (D. Minn.), which is currently on appeal to the Eighth Circuit.. Recently, Jake obtained a settlement for Massachusetts customers of Gate House Media newspaper subscriptions, estimated to exceed $2 million in total value. Jake was also a key member of the team that represented the Louisiana Municipal Police Employees’ Retirement System in In re Onyx Pharmaceuticals Inc. Shareholder Litigation, (Cal. Sup. Ct.), obtaining a $30 million settlement for shareholders in a matter arising out of Onyx’s $11-billion-dollar merger with Amgen.. Prior to joining Block & Leviton in 2015, Jake was an associate at two of the country’s top defense firms; Gibson Dunn in Palo Alto and Skadden, Arps in Boston. There, he represented boards of directors, corporate acquisition targets, and acquirers in litigation related to mergers and acquisitions. For example, Jake represented defendants in litigation related to the $5.3 billion private equity acquisition of Del Monte Foods Company in state and federal courts in California and in the Delaware Court of Chancery, as well as in litigation related to Intel’s $7.7 billion acquisition of McAfee Inc. in the Superior Court of California, Santa Clara County. He has also represented numerous third-parties, including various investment banks, in M&A litigation in California and Delaware courts.. While Jake’s eight-year career has centered on securities and corporate governance litigation, Jake also has significant experience representing several large technology companies, including in the defense of consumer class actions related to privacy and technology issues. He is a Certified Information Privacy Professional and has a deep understanding of technology and privacy issues. Jake has also represented companies in antitrust class actions and investigations, stockholder derivative actions, securities class actions, and in investigations before the F.T.C. and the Massachusetts Attorney General’s office.. In 2016 and 2017, Jake was named a “Rising Star” in securities litigation by Massachusetts Super Lawyers. Jake is admitted to practice in both Massachusetts and California. He graduated, cum laude, from the University of Michigan Law School in 2010.

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5

Location: Boston 02109
Firm: Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5

Location: Boston 02116

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5

Location: Boston 02109
Firm: Forward Financing LLC

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5

Location: Boston 02110
Firm: Greenberg Traurig

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5

Location: Boston 02109
Firm: Wilmerhale

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5

Location: Boston 02111

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.2 out of 5

Location: Boston 02110
Firm: U.S. Attorney's Office

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5

Location: Boston 02210

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.2 out of 5

Location: Boston 02134
Firm: Law Office of Isaac Garcia-Dale

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.7 out of 5

Location: Boston 02109
Firm: Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5

Location: Boston 02110
Firm: Greenberg Traurig

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5

Location: Boston 02210
Firm: Morrison Mahoney LLP

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5

Location: Boston 02201
Firm: Boston Retirement Board

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5

Location: Boston 02210
Firm: Goodwin Procter LLP

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.5 out of 5

Location: Boston 02210

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5

Location: Boston 02111

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.8 out of 5

Location: Boston 02110

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.7 out of 5

Location: Boston 02109

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5

Location: Boston 02110
Firm: Haemonetics Corporation

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5

Location: Boston 02110

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5

Location: Boston 02210
Firm: Foley Hoag LLP

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.6 out of 5

Location: Boston 02108
Firm: Lpl Financial

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.7 out of 5

Location: Boston 02111
Firm: Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo

1 2 Next

Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.