Top best Privacy Lawyers in Washington | 39 available

39 Privacy lawyers are available in Washington, Virginia. These lawyers are rated between 4.8/5 to 5/5 and 62% provide free consultation with fees ranging from $48 to $76 per hour.

Active Lawyers

23 - 39

Hourly Fees

$237 - $564

Free Consultations

48% - 76%

Average Rating

4.8 - 5.0 ★


FAQs - Privacy Lawyers in city Washington How many Privacy lawyers actively serve residents of Washington, District Of Columbia? Approximately 47 licensed attorneys focus on Privacy across Washington, District Of Columbia. Most matters are filed through the District Of Columbia District Court, where local rules shape timelines and filing steps. What is the typical hourly fee for Privacy lawyers in Washington, District Of Columbia? In Washington, typical rates range from $205-$343 per hour for Privacy. End-to-end case budgets frequently land between $3801 and $8393, depending on hearings and discovery. How long do Privacy matters usually take in courts near Washington? Privacy cases in Washington, District Of Columbia usually take around 2-8 months depending on complexity and the District Of Columbia District Court docket. Which local court most often hears Privacy cases for people living in Washington, District Of Columbia? Residents of Washington typically see Privacy filings handled by the District Of Columbia District Court. Proximity to helps with quick submissions and clerk communications. Do attorneys around offer a free first consultation for Privacy? About 61% of firms near ZIP offer a free first consultation for Privacy, so you can compare strategy and fit before committing.

39 Privacy Lawyers Found Near You

Avvo Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 4.3 out of 5

Location: Washington 20006
Firm: Ifrah Law

Michelle’s unfailing dedication to her clients is evidenced by the fact that her first client, whom she worked with as a first-year associate over 20 years ago, remains an active client. She establishes strong and lasting relationships by committing herself to client service. Michelle understands her clients’ business goals, guides them in their use of new technologies, and communicates with them as their business activities unfold.. Michelle’s practice is focused on helping her clients establish powerful and lasting relationships with their customers and prospects. Whether engaging audiences through sweepstakes/contests, social networks, telemarketing, text, or email marketing, Michelle ensures that her clients’ communications comply with current marketing and privacy laws and regulations. For clients who have embraced the popularity of online promotions and gamification, Michelle keeps programs running smoothly by providing guidance on the necessary rules, thresholds and disclosures in the midst of a constantly changing legal landscape. As clients rely more on social media to publicize promotions, Michelle provides up-to-the minute legal counsel related to the rules on Twitter, Facebook and other social sites.. As Ifrah Law increasingly leads the way in iGaming, Michelle advises daily fantasy sports and e-Sports companies on privacy matters, including drafting online terms and conditions, and preparing legal opinions and analysis to support iGaming companies’ launching of their services, including working with payment processors.. When clients find themselves involved in an enforcement matter with the Federal Trade Commission, Federal Communications Commission or state agencies, Michelle’s deep knowledge in these areas and her strong footing in the privacy community help her to resolve issues in the most expedient manner possible. Michelle has extensive experience defending individual and class actions in the consumer protection context, including dozens of Telephone Consumer Protection Act cases. She obtained a rare rescission of an FCC citation in a TCPA enforcement matter.. Michelle also advises clients as to what policies and procedures can be put in place to show a company’s good faith efforts, should the government come knocking. When companies are involved in potential data or security breaches, Michelle knows which questions to ask to ensure they have a sound legal strategy. She works with the company step-by-step to resolve the situation from both the government’s, and her clients’ as well as their customers’ points of view.. Previously, Michelle was a partner at Thompson Hine where she was a member of their telecommunications, corporate transactions & securities and emerging technologies groups. She began her legal career in the litigation department at Paul Hastings, where she spent seven years honing her litigation skills, prior to moving into their corporate practice. Her litigation experience gives her a solid foundation for helping clients avoid litigation as well as in advising them when they are faced with litigation. This litigation experience, coupled with her regulatory and corporate experience, allow Michelle to offer her clients a full complement of services.

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.6 out of 5

Location: Washington 20037
Firm: Epstein Becker & Green, PC

Michael S. Hollander is an Associate in the Health Care and Life Sciences practice, in the Washington, DC, office of Epstein Becker Green.. Mr. Hollander:. Mr. Hollander is a Certified CSF Practitioner, a designation given by the Health Information Trust Alliance (HITRUST), an organization that provides training to develop and maintain effective security programs for health care and life sciences companies that comply with security laws, regulations, and standards, including HITECH, HIPAA, PCI, JCAHO, CMS, ISO, NIST, and various other federal, state, and business requirements.. Before joining Epstein Becker Green, Mr. Hollander was a partner at a health policy firm focused on health reform and its impact on private and public health insurance markets.. Prior to attending law school, Mr. Hollander interned with the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on Law and National Security. While in law school, he served as a Judicial Intern for the Honorable Gary L. Crawford (now retired) of the District Court of Maryland, District 6, in Montgomery County.

Lawyers Rating: Rated 4.4 out of 5

Location: Washington 20006

Lawyers Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5

Location: Washington 20036
Firm: ZwillGen PLLC

Lawyers Rating: Rated 4.0 out of 5

Location: Washington 20036
Firm: Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.8 out of 5

Location: Washington 20036
Firm: Zwillgen, Pllc

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.8 out of 5

Location: Washington 20003

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: WHITE & CASE

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.9 out of 5

Location: Washington 20006
Firm: Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.8 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.4 out of 5

Location: Washington 20004
Firm: Shearman & Sterling Llp

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.8 out of 5

Location: Washington 20006

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.7 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: Pepper Hamilton LLP.

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.7 out of 5

Location: Washington 20001
Firm: Goodwin Procter

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.7 out of 5

Location: Washington 20004
Firm: Hogan Lovells Us LLP

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5

Location: Washington 20037

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.9 out of 5

Location: Washington 20004
Firm: Covington & Burling

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.9 out of 5

Location: Washington 20036
Firm: Schwartz & Ballen

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.6 out of 5

Location: Washington 20004
Firm: Hogan Lovells

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.8 out of 5

Location: Washington 20037
Firm: Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.7 out of 5

Location: Washington 20004
Firm: ALSTON + BIRD LLP

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.7 out of 5

Location: Washington 20005
Firm: Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5

Location: Washington 20001

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.7 out of 5

Location: Washington 20004
Firm: Hogan & Hartson

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.9 out of 5

Location: Washington 20004
Firm: VENABLE LLP

1 2 Next

Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.