Top Litigation Lawyers in ZIP 90071 | 329 available
329 Litigation lawyers are available in ZIP code 90071 in los Angeles, California, including Catherine Allen, Catherine Coble, Catherine Latempa, and Catherine Mitchell. Average rating of these lawyers is 3.9/5 and 53% provide free consultation.
Showing top 10 Litigation attorneys
in los Angeles, California near ZIP code 90071.
Click any pin to view lawyer details, ratings, and contact information.
Gold pins indicate top-rated lawyers.
Litigation Case Statistics Overview
Litigation Case Timeline
Litigation cases in Los Angeles typically take 9 to 36 months from filing to resolution, depending on complexity, court backlog, and settlement likelihood.
los Angeles Court Backlog
The Los Angeles court system often manages a backlog ranging from 15,000 to 40,000 pending litigation cases, which can affect scheduling and timelines.
Litigation los Angeles Filing Volume
Estimated new litigation filings in Los Angeles range from 1,200 to 2,500 cases per month, reflecting the city's large population and active legal market.
Litigation Case Outcomes
Approximately 35% of disputes resolve before formal litigation, 25% settle after filing but before trial, and about 10% succeed at trial; outcomes vary by case type.
FAQs - Litigation Lawyers in 90071 city los Angeles
How many Administrative , Appellate , Civil , White Collar Crime, Litigation, Litigation lawyers actively serve residents of Los Angeles, California (90071)?
Approximately 61 licensed attorneys focus on Administrative , Appellate , Civil , White Collar Crime, Litigation, Litigation across Los Angeles, California (90071). Most matters are filed through the California District Court, where local rules shape timelines and filing steps.
How long do Administrative , Appellate , Civil , White Collar Crime, Litigation, Litigation matters usually take in courts near Los Angeles (90071)?
Administrative , Appellate , Civil , White Collar Crime, Litigation, Litigation cases in Los Angeles, California usually take around 3-6 months depending on complexity and the California District Court docket.
Which local court most often hears Administrative , Appellate , Civil , White Collar Crime, Litigation, Litigation cases for people living in Los Angeles, California?
Residents of Los Angeles typically see Administrative , Appellate , Civil , White Collar Crime, Litigation, Litigation filings handled by the California District Court. Proximity to 90071 helps with quick submissions and clerk communications.
Do attorneys around 90071 offer a free first consultation for Administrative , Appellate , Civil , White Collar Crime, Litigation, Litigation?
About 58% of firms near ZIP 90071 offer a free first consultation for Administrative , Appellate , Civil , White Collar Crime, Litigation, Litigation, so you can compare strategy and fit before committing.
350 South Grand Ave , Los Angeles , California 90071
Practice Areas: Litigation
A partner at the Los Angeles office of Ford Harrison, LLP, attorney Daniel Chammas has broad experience in employment law and class action defense. As a member of Venable’s Labor and Employment Practice Group, he represents media production studios, major consumer goods and services providers, and other companies against consumer class actions and an extensive range of employment claims, from sexual harassment to unpaid wages. Daniel Chammas also advises clients in various employment matters, such as leave and disability guidelines, wage and hour law compliance, and employee dismissal.Prior to joining Venable, Dan Chammas spent 17 years handling employment law and class action suits at Venable LLP and McDermott Will & Emery LLP. Over the course of his career, he has defeated class certification or achieved favorable resolution in all manner of employment disputes. Daniel Chammas has successfully defended clients in such notable class actions as a disability discrimination suit brought by the Department of Fair Employment and Housing and an alleged wage and hour violation claim against a multinational wireless tracking company tried before the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.Before beginning his career, Dan Chammas graduated summa cum laude from UCLA with a BA in political science and earned a JD from Stanford University Law School.
Avvo Review
“Dan did two things that really impressed me. First, he understood and grasped the legal issue quick”
355 South Grand Avenue , Los Angeles , California 90071
Practice Areas: Litigation
Named to the list of "Leaders of Influence: Litigators & Trial Lawyers" by Los Angeles Business Journal and recognized as a California Star and State Litigation Star by Benchmark Litigation in the areas of General Commercial, Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment.. Dana Delman is the co–founder and a partner of Delman Vukmanovic LLP. Dana is highly respected by her peers in the Los Angeles legal community due to her highly intelligent, meticulous, and relentless approach to tackling difficult legal issues and disputes.. A Skilled and Persuasive Business Attorney. Dana has garnered more than 20 years of in–the–trenches experience as a hands–on attorney fighting for individuals and businesses of all means and sizes. Over time she has developed the keen sense of strategy and case management that her clients have learned to count on. Through her civil litigation and appellate work she has amassed an enviable track record of favorable conclusions, litigating a wide array of cases covering diverse areas of the law; areas of expertise span an extensive range of intricate business litigation and transaction issues that include fraud, intellectual property law, corporate/partner dissolution, legal malpractice, entertainment law, real estate litigation, employment lawsuits, personal injury, and fair debt collection.. A Comprehensive Litigation Career. Dana’s noteworthy large–firm background reflects the embodiment of her top–notch legal work and expertise. Her clear, precise communication skills and her commitment to even the smallest detail have established her as a first–class legal writer. Over her sweeping career, she has produced a diversified aggregate of persuasive briefs and motions that have resulted in many successful dispositive motions and successful appellate briefs to the California and United States Courts of Appeal. Some of Dana’s work presented before the Ninth Circuit United States Court of Appeal has resulted in a shift of legal standards applied in that circuit. Moreover, she has had success on her clients’ behalf in often very contentious mediations and binding arbitrations, as well as civil jury trials in courtrooms all over Southern California.. Transaction Skills Honed in the Trenches. Several years ago—at the request of many of her business litigation clients—Dana began working on their transactions in addition to handling their litigation needs. Her clients realized they needed even stronger and more concise contracts than the ones their transactional attorneys were supplying. Building on her impressive litigation experience, Dana went on to establish a set of skills structuring transactions that help avoid litigation disputes and better protect her clients.. In addition to her skills as an attorney, Dana’s acute ability to read people and quickly discern their circumstances makes her a canny adversary to opponents as well as an empathetic and supportive presence for her clients.
444 S. Flower Street , Los Angeles , California 90071
Practice Areas: Environmental, Litigation, Real Estate, Business, Corporate, Environmental and Natural Resources
Charles D. Ferrari is a Senior Associate at ADLI Law Group. Mr. Ferrari focuses on transactional work in addition to business, real estate, construction defect, environmental and toxic tort litigation.. With 30 years of experience as an attorney, Mr. Ferrari possesses the uncommon blend of vast litigation experience with an extensive general business background. Armed with a degree in economics and years of experience as a restaurant owner and supermarket manager, Mr. Ferrari successfully served as a general counsel for a NASDAQ-traded corporation and related entities. Later, as general counsel for the Oregon State agencies, advising them on all aspects of their operations from regulation promulgation and rule enforcement to employment issues and contract procurement/enforcement. But Mr. Ferrari transcends the traditional role of business counsel, providing litigation representation in all judicial and administrative forums. His representation has ranged from class action and complex commercial and environmental cases to limited jurisdiction premises liability cases and administrative hearings, successfully arguing appellate cases such as Resolution Trust Corp. v. Rossmoor Corp. (1995) 34 th 93, Ryan v. Lustre-Cal (2014) WL 7384613, McCormick v. San Pedro Bait Co., Inc. (2009) WL 4801962 and the federal district court decision, Ameripride Services, Inc. v. Valley Industrial Service, Inc. (2007 E.D. Cal.) WL 656850. He also has successfully briefed numerous 42 U.S.C. section 1942 and other constitutional issues in California and Oregon.. Mr. Ferrari is admitted to practice before all state and federal courts in California and Oregon, including the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. He is a graduate of California State University- Northridge and holds a juris doctorate from University of California-Davis School of Law.
Avvo Review
“ved to be able to litigate these matters to help Hudson Insurance Company obtain some very favorable”
Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
