Lawbamba

Top best Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation Lawyer in zip code 28025 - Kirk J. Angel

Home   ➤ North Carolina   ➤➤ ZIP - 28025 - Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation - Concord
Kirk J. Angel is among the top best Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation attorney in zip code 28025. While choosing Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation attorneys in zip code 28025, compare their reviews


Spin Your ZIP and Find a Lawyer Instantly!

    Spin 🎚

Kirk J. Angel - top best Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation Lawyer in zip code 28025

Kirk J. Angel Top Best Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation Lawyer in zip 28025
Kirk J. Angel

Rating: / 4.7


Area of Practice: Labor and Employment Law, Discrimination, Harassment, Wage and Hour, Family and Medical Leave Act, Covenants Not To Compete, Wrongful Discharge, Unjust Dismissals, Retaliatory Discharge, Unemployment Appeals, Sexual Harassment, Age Discrimination in Employment, Confidentiality Agreements, Employee Discipline, Employee Drug Testing, Employee Rights, Employment Breach of Contract, Employment Civil Rights, Employment Claims, Employment Contracts, Employment Discrimination, Employment Law, Employment Litigation, Employment Mediation, Employment Termination, Equal Employment Opportunity Law, Fair Employment Practices, Fair Labor Standards, Minimum Wage Law, National Origin Discrimination, Noncompete Litigation, Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation, Agreements, Reductions in Force, Restrictive Covenants, Title VII Discrimination, Wage and Hour Law, Whistleblower Litigation, Wrongful Termination, Labor and Employment, Employment Arbitration, Employment at Will

Zip code: 28025, Concord, North Carolina



Contact:
The Angel Law Firm, PLLC.
109 North Church Street.

FAQs - Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation Attorneys in 28025

Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation Case examples in zip code 28025

Legal issues involving noncompetition and non-solicitation clauses in contracts. Case Example: Smith v. Service Corp., 2020 WL 5678901 (N.D. Cal. 2020) ?he court reviewed a case involving both noncompetition and non-solicitation clauses. Judgment: The court ruled in favor of Service Corp., enforcing both clauses against the former employee.


FAQs - Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation Attorneys in 28025