Lawbamba

Top best ERISA Lawyer in zip code 35223 - Mark E. Tindal

Home   ➤ Alabama   ➤➤ Zip- 35223 - Birmingham - ERISA

Mark E. Tindal is among the top best ERISA attorney in zip code 35223. While choosing ERISA attorneys in zip code 35223, compare their reviews

Use the Legal issue filters to select and navigate to other areas of practice within the zip.



Mark E. Tindal - top best ERISA Lawyer in zip code 35223

Mark E. Tindal

Rating: 5


Area of Practice: ERISA,General Practice

Zip code: 35223, Birmingham, Alabama

Mark E. Tindal Avvo Reviews
I found Mr. Price to be very knowledgeable and easy to talk to. He was able to communicate with me exactly what needed to be done step by step. No sur...a clientI have hired Mark Price to represent me in two separate legal matters. In both cases, Mark won the case for me with excellent results. I was extremel...ColeI used mr price for several complicated legal matters and had very good results..Can recommend him unconditionally for his honesty and legal expertise...JamesI hired Mr. Price to handle my mother's estate when she passed away and he did an excellent job. I consulted him once and he handled it from there. I ...HughHired Mark to proceed over my divorce including my daughter. Mark provided excellent insight, vision and predicted many of the future outcomes. With h...RyanHe answered my question quickly and provided solutions for me when nobody else would. I needed advice on my boyfriend case in AL, were not from there ...D’Ara StevensonMark has done a phenomenal job before DHR. The lawyers and workers for DHR seem to have a script, and Mark know how to break that script. He makes t...Concerned ...

Contact: 205-967-8822
Lloyd, Gray and Whitehead, P.C..
2501 20th Place South 300.

FAQs - ERISA Attorneys in 35223

ERISA Case examples in zip code 35223

Description: Legal disputes involving disability claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), focusing on benefits and eligibility. Case Example: Smith v. ERISA Plan Administrator (2018) - Litigation over denial of disability benefits under ERISA. Judgment: The court ruled in favor of the claimant, requiring the plan administrator to provide the benefits.