Lawbamba

Top best Copyrights Lawyers in zip code 37201 Nashville

Home   ➤ Tennessee   ➤➤ Zip- 37201 - Nashville - Copyrights

We have more than 4 top best Copyrights lawyers in zip code 37201, Nashville, Tennessee. Karl D. Warden, James Fessenden are among the top best Copyrights attorneys in zip code 37201. While choosing lawyers in zip code 37201, compare their reviews.


Karl D. Warden - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 37201

Karl D. Warden

Rating: 5


Area of Practice: Business & Commercial,Business ,Civil ,Copyrights,Elder ,Estate Planning,Probate ,Trademarks

Zip code: 37201, Nashville, Tennessee

Karl D. Warden Avvo Reviews
Karl handled the elder law work for my parents. I would recommend his services to everyone. ...

Contact: 615-256-2602
Jackson, Kweller, McKinney, Warden and Hayes.
Second Avenue North.

James Fessenden - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 37201

James Fessenden

Area of Practice: Business ,Copyrights,Labor

Zip code: 37201, Nashville, Tennessee



Contact: 615-259-3456
King and Ballow.
1100 Union Street Plaza   315 Union Street Tenne.

Alan E. Korpady - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 37201

Alan E. Korpady

Rating: 3.55


Area of Practice: Business & Commercial,Copyrights,Corporate ,Securities ,Technology and Science,Trademarks

Zip code: 37201, Nashville, Tennessee



Contact: 615-259-3456
King and Ballow.
1100 Union Street Plaza   315 Union Street Tenne.

Steven J. Eisen - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 37201

Steven J. Eisen

Rating: 3.35


Area of Practice: Banking & Finance,Business & Commercial,Copyrights,Corporate ,Entertainment & Sports ,Mergers & Acquisitions,Securities ,Technology and Science

Zip code: 37201, Nashville, Tennessee



Contact: 615-726-5600

Commerce Center   1000.

count 4 Top best Copyrights lawyers in Nashville

Description: General legal rights granted to creators of original works, including the exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, and perform their work. Case Example: Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (1984) - Dispute over the legality of home video recording. Judgment: Court ruled that home recording for private use did not infringe copyrights.