Lawbamba

Top best Commercial Litigation Lawyers in zip code 72202 Little Rock

Home   ➤ Arkansas   ➤➤ Zip- 72202 - Little Rock - Commercial Litigation

We have more than 3 top best Commercial Litigation lawyers in zip code 72202, Little Rock, Arkansas. Julie Dewoody Greathouse, Patrick L. Spivey are among the top best Commercial Litigation attorneys in zip code 72202. While choosing lawyers in zip code 72202, compare their reviews.


Julie Dewoody Greathouse - top best Commercial Litigation Lawyer in zip code 72202

Julie Dewoody Greathouse

Rating: / 4.4


Area of Practice: Commercial Litigation, Civil Litigation, Environmental Law, Appellate Practice, Natural Resources Law, Oil and Gas Law, Toxic Torts, Trial Practice

Zip code: 72202, Little Rock, Arkansas



Contact: 501-603-9000
PPGMR LAW, PLLC.
101 Morgan Keegan Drive.

Patrick L. Spivey - top best Commercial Litigation Lawyer in zip code 72202

Patrick L. Spivey

Rating: / 4


Area of Practice: Civil and Commercial Litigation, Real Estate Transactions and Disputes, Construction Law, Insurance Defense, Creditors Rights, Criminal Defense

Zip code: 72202, Little Rock, Arkansas



Contact:
Fuqua Campbell, P.A. Attorneys at Law.
Riviera Tower.

Eric R. Gribble - top best Commercial Litigation Lawyer in zip code 72202

Eric R. Gribble

Rating: / 3.9


Area of Practice: General Civil, Commercial Litigation, Criminal Defense, Professional Liability Defense, Product Liability, Tort and Personal Injury Defense, Coverage Opinions and Loss Investigations, Family Law, Construction Law, Contracts, Subrogation, Debt Collection

Zip code: 72202, Little Rock, Arkansas



Contact:
Fuqua Campbell, P.A. Attorneys at Law.
Riviera Tower.

Commercial Litigation Attorneys in 72202

Commercial Litigation Case examples in zip code 72202

Description: Deals with complex commercial disputes involving antitrust issues, including market competition and trade practices. Case Example: In re: Optical Disk Drive Antitrust Litigation, 2016 - Addressed complex commercial antitrust claims. Judgment: The court awarded damages based on anti-competitive practices.