Lawbamba

Top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 84133 - John H. Rees

Home   ➤ Utah   ➤➤ Zip- 84133 - Salt Lake City - Copyrights

John H. Rees is among the top best Copyrights attorney in zip code 84133. While choosing Copyrights attorneys in zip code 84133, compare their reviews

Use the Legal issue filters to select and navigate to other areas of practice within the zip.



John H. Rees - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 84133

John H. Rees

Rating: 3.25


Area of Practice: Copyrights,Corporate ,Internet ,Trademarks

Zip code: 84133, Salt Lake City, Utah

John H. Rees Avvo Reviews
I have used John on several fronts and he's always very knowledgeable and professional. I can honestly say I feel he always has my best interest at h...jeanieJohn has always been very responsive and thorough in his work with our company. He is easy to work with and fully invested in the welfare of the busi...BobJohn has worked with our company for 15 years and has always provided excellent and prompt service. His knowledge of intellectual property and tradem...RyanJohn's exceptional performance as our attorney has been nothing short of remarkable. His comprehensive expertise in the field of intellectual property...JeffJohn, has all the things I look for in legal counsel. He is highly intelligent, he is a great communicator and is always a calming and professional p...Matt ...

Contact: 801-530-7300

Gateway Tower East.

Catherine Parrish Lake - top best Copyrights Lawyer in zip code 84133

Catherine Parrish Lake

Area of Practice: Copyrights,Intellectual Property ,Internet ,Trademarks

Zip code: 84133, Salt Lake City, Utah



Contact: 801-530-7300
Callister Nebeker and McCullough, A Professional Corporation.
Gateway Tower East.

count 2 Top best Copyrights lawyers in Salt Lake City

Description: General legal rights granted to creators of original works, including the exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, and perform their work. Case Example: Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (1984) - Dispute over the legality of home video recording. Judgment: Court ruled that home recording for private use did not infringe copyrights.