Lawbamba

Top best Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation Lawyer in zip code 89101 - F. Thomas Edwards

Home   ➤ Nevada   ➤➤ ZIP - 89101 - Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation - Las Vegas
F. Thomas Edwards is among the top best Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation attorney in zip code 89101. While choosing Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation attorneys in zip code 89101, compare their reviews


Spin Your ZIP and Find a Lawyer Instantly!

    Spin 🎚

F. Thomas Edwards - top best Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation Lawyer in zip code 89101

F. Thomas Edwards Top Best Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation Lawyer in zip 89101
F. Thomas Edwards

Rating: / 4.6


Area of Practice: Litigation, Complex Litigation, Defense Litigation, Federal Civil Litigation, Trial Practice, Commercial Landlord and Tenant Law, Evictions, Landlord and Tenant Law, Lease Terminations, Unlawful Detainer, Class Action Defense, Americans with Disabilities Act, Confidentiality Agreements, Covenants Not To Compete, Disability Discrimination, Employee Discipline, Employee Drug Testing, Employee Privacy, Employer Liability, Employment Breach of Contract, Employment Class Actions, Employer Rights, Employment at Will, Employment Claims, Employment Contracts, Employment Defense, Employment Disability Discrimination, Employment Discrimination, Employment Law, Employment Litigation, Employment Termination, Fair Labor Standards, Family and Medical Leave Act, Minimum Wage Law, Noncompete Litigation, Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation, Personnel Policies, Restrictive Covenants, Retaliatory Discharge, Title VII Discrimination, Wage and Hour Class Actions, Wage and Hour Law

Zip code: 89101, Las Vegas, Nevada



Contact:
Holley, Driggs, Walch, Fine, Wray, Puzey & Thompson.
400 South Fourth Street.

FAQs - Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation Attorneys in 89101

Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation Case examples in zip code 89101

Legal issues involving noncompetition and non-solicitation clauses in contracts. Case Example: Smith v. Service Corp., 2020 WL 5678901 (N.D. Cal. 2020) ?he court reviewed a case involving both noncompetition and non-solicitation clauses. Judgment: The court ruled in favor of Service Corp., enforcing both clauses against the former employee.


FAQs - Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation Attorneys in 89101