Top Litigation Lawyers in ZIP 98107 | 4 available

4 Litigation lawyers are available in ZIP code 98107 in Seattle, Washington. Average rating of these lawyers is 5.0/5 and 60% provide free consultation.

Litigation Lawyers Nearby Seattle 98107 (by distance)

Within 5 miles near you

Litigation Attorney (Seattle Area) 98117 1.4 miles

Litigation Attorney (Seattle Area) 98199 1.6 miles

Litigation Attorney (Seattle Area) 98103 1.7 miles

Litigation Attorney (Seattle Area) 98119 2.0 miles

Litigation Attorney (Seattle Area) 98109 2.9 miles

Litigation Attorney (Seattle Area) 98195 3.4 miles

Litigation Attorney (Seattle Area) 98121 3.9 miles

Litigation Attorney (Seattle Area) 98101 4.4 miles

Litigation Attorney (Seattle Area) 98154 4.7 miles

Litigation Attorney (Seattle Area) 98164 4.8 miles


Litigation Case Statistics Overview

Litigation Case Timeline

Min6Max30

Litigation cases in Seattle typically take between 6 and 30 months to resolve, depending on complexity, court schedules, and settlement likelihood.

Seattle Court Backlog

Low300Medium600High1200

The number of pending litigation cases in Seattle courts generally ranges from 300 to 1,200, reflecting both active filings and ongoing matters.

Litigation Seattle Filing Volume

Min100Max250

Seattle courts see an estimated 100 to 250 new litigation cases filed per month, based on recent public court data.

Litigation Case Outcomes

Pre-litigation30Post-filing45Trial15

Approximately 30% of disputes resolve before formal litigation, 45% after filing but before trial, and around 15% proceed to trial with variable outcomes.


4 Litigation Lawyers Found Near You

Avvo Rating: Rated 5.0 out of 5
Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.5 out of 5

Location: Seattle 98107
Area(s) of Practice: Litigation

Since law school, I have specialized in representing individuals against overreaching governmental actions.  I assist individuals incarcerated in the Washington Department of Corrections.  I litigate Public Records Act cases against public entities while asserting the public's right to know what their government is doing.  I also assist individuals to constitutionally challenge their conviction in post-conviction proceedings including filing writs of habeas corpus in federal court on their behalf.  Let me help you.. Mike Kahrs

Lawyers Rating: Rated 4.5 out of 5

Location: Seattle 98107
Firm: Fasy Law, PLLC
Area(s) of Practice: Litigation

Daniel Fasy has represented numerous plaintiffs in sexual abuse, employment, and personal injury cases at both the trial and appellate court levels.  He has been co-counsel on cases resulting in millions of dollars in verdicts and settlements for clients who have been harmed as a result of another party’s negligence.. Dan was born in Spokane, Washington.  He received his undergraduate degree from the University of Washington, where he received numerous academic awards and honors.  After graduating from college, he traveled the country as a public relations representative, and then returned to the University of Washington to attend law school.  While in law school, Dan represented low-income clients and served as a mediator in employment disputes and civil cases through the University’s clinical programs.  He also worked on environmental litigation with the Sierra Club’s legal department in San Francisco.. After law school, Dan received a Bonderman Travel Fellowship, which allowed him to pursue independent research throughout the world.  When he returned from his fellowship travels, Dan served as a judicial clerk for the Washington State Court of Appeals, where he worked closely with an appellate court judge to write numerous opinions in criminal and civil cases.. When he is not practicing law, Dan participates in a number of community activities.  He also enjoys playing softball, tennis, and racquetball, and hiking and surfing in the Pacific Northwest.

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.3 out of 5

Location: Seattle 98107
Area(s) of Practice: Litigation

Lawyers Rating: Rated 3.1 out of 5

Location: Seattle 98107
Area(s) of Practice: Litigation

Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.