Top Best Criminal Defense Lawyers | 33889 Available
Find Top Best Rated Criminal Defense attorneys near you. Many offer free consultations and have verified client reviews.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does a Criminal Defense lawyer in your area do?
A Criminal Defense lawyer helps clients pursue compensation for injuries, medical expenses, lost wages, and other damages related to Criminal Defense cases in your area.
How much does a Criminal Defense lawyer cost in your area?
Most Criminal Defense lawyers work on a contingency fee basis, meaning they only get paid if they win the case. Fees are usually a percentage of the settlement or verdict.
When should I hire a Criminal Defense lawyer in your area?
You should contact a Criminal Defense lawyer as soon as possible after the incident to protect evidence, meet legal deadlines, and improve your chances of receiving compensation.
How do I choose the best Criminal Defense lawyer in your area?
Look for attorneys with experience handling Criminal Defense cases, strong client reviews, and a track record of successful settlements or verdicts.
33889 Criminal Defense Lawyers Found
Experienced Criminal Defense attorney serving clients in United States and surrounding areas.
My favorite google review said "He has small town morals and super skills as an attorney." I grew up in small towns in Iowa, I am honored by that statement, and I will always give my best.
We fight traffic infractions and we’re really good at it. Our unique blend of aggressive traffic ticket defense combined with proprietary software and an unceasing desire to serve our clients give us the competitive edge. Keep that ticket from hitting your insurance or affecting your job. The cost of hiring a traffic lawyer is relatively low, most infractions are handled for a flat fee of $199. Our attorney, Craig Cahoon, has years of experience and can help you get the best result for your ticket.. Our website, , can answer many of your questions but if you would like to hear a friendly voice then call us at. If you like to write then email us at. Traffic Tickets:
William R. Ponall is Board Certified by the Florida Bar in Criminal Appellate Law. Mr. Ponall is one of fewer than 30 private attorneys in the State of Florida who holds that designation. He has over 13 years of experience handling State and Federal criminal appeals, post conviction matters, and complex criminal cases throughout the State of Florida. Prior to entering private practice, he was a Staff Attorney for the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.. Mr. Ponall has had articles, addressing both substantive criminal law and criminal appeals, published in The Florida Defender, a magazine published by the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and The Briefs, a magazine published by the Orange County Bar Association. He graduated with honors from the University of Florida and the University Of Florida College of Law.. Mr. Ponall is a Past President of the Central Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the Co-Chair of the Committee on Proposed Criminal Jury Instructions and Rules for the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and a member of the Orange Country Bar Appellate Practice Committee. He was selected by his peers as a Rising Star in 2012 and a Super Lawyer in 2013, 2015, and 2016.
I am an appellate attorney, trial lawyer, law practice management consultant, freelance writer, husband, and father. My law practice website is located at , where I provide information about issues related to Alabama law. For several years I was the Law Practice Management Guide for (), which is owned by the New York Times Company. I also write for a variety of other websites and publications, and I have published articles in publications produced by the Alabama State Bar, the Alabama Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, and the American Bar Association. However, most of my time is devoted to the practice of appellate law in Alabama.
Matthew P. Ferry graduated from the University of Florida with a Bachelor’s of Science degree in Finance, and earned his Juris Doctor degree from Barry University School of Law. Mr. Ferry has practiced criminal defense law exclusively since 2006. As a partner with the law firm of Lindsey, Ferry & Parker P.A., Mr. Ferry has successfully defended clients throughout Central Florida on felony, misdemeanor, DUI and traffic related cases.. In addition, Mr. Ferry represents clients charged in federal cases before the U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida. During the past sixteen years, he has dedicated himself to the practice of law with the goal of vigorously and successfully defending his clients against criminal charges brought against them. Mr. Ferry is admitted to practice law in the state courts of Florida and the U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida. He is a member of the Federal Bar, the National Federal Bar Association, the Orlando Chapter of the Federal Bar Association, The Florida Bar, the Orange County Bar Association, the Central Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and the Association of Trial Lawyers of America. In 2010, Mr. Ferry was appointed chair of the Criminal Law Committee of the Orange County Bar Association. In 2012, he was appointed to the Board of Directors for the Central Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. In 2015, he was nominated by The Florida Bar to lecture to attorneys on criminal law. Mr. Ferry was nominated by his peers as the number one rising star in the November 2015 edition of Orlando Style Magazine. Super Lawyers selected Matt Ferry to its 2016 and 2017 lists of Florida Rising Stars. This honor is awarded to attorneys who have demonstrated excellence in the practice of law and is limited to no more than 2.5 percent of attorneys within Florida.
Experienced Criminal Defense attorney serving clients in United States and surrounding areas.
Experienced Criminal Defense attorney serving clients in United States and surrounding areas.
John Menzel, J.D., and his firm defend people charged with drunk driving and related offenses in New Jersey. John Menzel, J.D., has. > appeared in more than 300 municipal courts in all of New Jersey's 21 counties.. > tried more than a thousand drunk driving cases.. > argued more than 100 appeals before the New Jersey Superior Court's Law and Appellate Divisions and New Jersey Supreme Court.. > prepared writs of habeas corpus in Federal District Court for the District of New Jersey and Federal Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.. > instructed lawyers and laypersons on drunk driving laws, breath testing instrumentation, and trial techniques at 149 seminars in New Jersey, Massachusetts, Alabama, Texas, Nevada, Georgia, Louisiana, and California.. > participated as a lead attorney in State v. Chun and State v. Foley, the seminal cases on the Alcotest 7110 MK-III-C in New Jersey as well as other significant cases on breath test refusal, motor vehicle operation, probable cause, and speedy trial.. > participating as a lead attorney in State v. Holland and State v. Pizzo dealing with NIST traceability and comparability of the Ertco-Hart digital temperature measuring system and Control Company digital thermometer used during Alcotest recalibrations.. > argued State v. Frye this past January in the New Jersey Supreme Court concerning whether prior DUI convictions should enhance sentencing on later breath test refusal convictions.. > wrote the NJSBA amicus brief to the New Jersey Supreme Court in State v. Koropchak concerning certain police reports should be admissible evidence at trial.. SIGNIFICANT CASES. > State v. Pizzo, 422 N.J.Super. 185 (., April 2011), after remand 309 (., Dec. 2011), the companion case to State v. Holland, a remand considering the efficacy of substituting the Ertco-Hart digital temperature measuring system used during Alcotest recalibrations with a digital thermometer manufactured by Control Company, Inc.. > State v. Kim, 412 N.J.Super. 260 (. 2010), a puzzling affirmance of a breath test refusal conviction, following acquittal of DWI after trial, barring the challenge to the refusal conviction on procedural grounds but including a “concurrence” disagreeing with the majority’s determination on the merits.. > State v. Chun, 191 N.J. 308 (2007), 194 N.J. 54 (2008), concerning admissibility of new breath testing technology--the Drager Alcotest 7110 MK-III-C breath testing device using version firmware. > State v. Cummings, 184 N.J. 84 (2005), declaring unconstitutional the “preponderance of evidence” as the burden of proof for breath test refusal charges. > State v. Foley, Cartegena, et al., 370 N.J.Super. 341 (Law Div. 2003), in Superior Court, Law Division, Camden County, concerning admissibility of new breath testing technology--the Draeger Alcotest 7110 MK III C breath testing device using version 3.8 firmware. > State v. Farrell, 320 N.J.Super. 435 (. 1999), the leading case involving the rights to speedy trial and fundamental fairness for those charged with drunk driving in New Jersey. > State v. Garthe, 145 N.J. 1 (1996), concerning the admissibility of Breathalyzer results in light of the secrecy surrounding Breathalyzer inspection procedures
Jay Englund focuses his practice on criminal defense. He has defended thousands of people charged in a wide range of criminal and traffic offenses ranging from the most serious felonies to minor traffic violations. Before starting Englund & Associates Law Office, LLC, Attorney Englund gained valuable experience while working for one of the largest law firms in the eight county area of central Wisconsin. Before private practice, Attorney Englund clerked with the Eau Claire County Public Defender's Office and at the Waukesha County District Attorney's Office, both of which provided him with invaluable knowledge of the criminal justice system.
Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer;. U.S. Federal Court, Middle District of Florida;. U.S. Federal Court, Northern District of Florida;. U.S. Federal Court, Southern District of Florida;. U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals;. U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals;. U.S. Supreme Court Bar;. U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces;. Represents attorneys in bar grievance and bar discipline cases;. Represents clients in Central Florida in Orange, Seminole, Osceola, Brevard, Polk and Lake Counties (Orlando, Sanford, Kissimmee, Melbourne, Viera, Bartow and Tavares);. Federal practice;. Federal Mortgage Fraud;. RICO;. Internet and Traveling to Meet Minor Charges (throughout Florida). Specialized defense of sex crime allegation. Specialized defense of child pornography allegation
Experienced Criminal Defense attorney serving clients in United States and surrounding areas.
Experienced Criminal Defense attorney serving clients in United States and surrounding areas.
Experienced Criminal Defense attorney serving clients in United States and surrounding areas.
Experienced Criminal Defense attorney serving clients in United States and surrounding areas.
Experienced Criminal Defense attorney serving clients in United States and surrounding areas.
Experienced Criminal Defense attorney serving clients in United States and surrounding areas.
Experienced Criminal Defense attorney serving clients in United States and surrounding areas.
Experienced Criminal Defense attorney serving clients in United States and surrounding areas.
Ron’s current practice centers almost exclusively on criminal defense and he has successfully defended cases ranging anywhere from murder to simple traffic tickets. As a lawyer, he believes that every person is entitled to be treated fairly and with dignity regardless of the charges they face. He understands that when a person is accused of a crime, the entire weight of the judicial system can come crashing down on that person and often Ron is the only one who can protect his client from an unfair conviction or sentence. Ron relishes the role of the underdog and the opportunity to protect his client’s from unfair accusations. He takes his role as a defense attorney extremely serious and seeks to provide his clients with honest, candid and useful advice tailored to the specific needs of each client. He believes each and every client is entitled to the best representation, regardless of the crime charged.