Top Litigation Lawyers in Washington | 1097 available
1097 Litigation lawyers are available in Washington, District of Columbia, including Michelle Iris Banker, Michelle L Schaefer, Michelle W Cohen, and Mika Clark. These lawyers are rated between 2.8/5 to 3.2/5 and 50% provide free consultation.
Litigation in Washington typically spans from 6 to 30 months, depending on case complexity, court schedules, and settlement likelihood.
Washington Court Backlog
Estimated active litigation caseloads range from 200 to 1,200 cases, reflecting varying court and docket loads across the city.
Litigation Washington Filing Volume
Washington courts see an estimated 100 to 350 new litigation filings per month, based on public court records and directory data.
Litigation Case Outcomes
Approximately 35% of cases resolve pre-litigation, 25% post-filing but before trial, and about 10% succeed at trial; the remainder may settle or be dismissed at other stages.
20 M St, SE , Washington , District of Columbia 20003
Practice Areas: Litigation
Experience, Compassion, Strategy, Planning and a Personal Relationship--Every client and every case is different--every person we help recieves a personally tailored approach to his or her case. Whether you have been badly injured through no fault of your own, experienced the death of a loved one because of the negligence of another, been a victim of medical or legal malpractice or have experienced sexual assault, Nathan handles each and every case with the utmost discretion, sensitivity, professionalism and care.. Nathan is an experienced litigator in state and federal courta. Contact him for a free consultation to see if he can help you.
Lawyers.com Review
“I’ve worked with Nathan on several cases as well as within the Virginia Trial Lawyers Association. Nathan is a knowledgeable attorney upon whose expertise and advice I trust and he…”
1333 H Street, NW , Washington , District of Columbia 20005
Practice Areas: Litigation, Securities & Investment Fraud, Criminal Defense, White Collar Crime
Lawyers.com Review
“Three words immediately come to mind when describing Mona Benach: intelligent, capable, and ethical. Her past experience as Senior Counsel in the Enforcement Division of the U.S. S…”
1717 Pennsylvania Ave, N.W. , Washington , District of Columbia 20006
Practice Areas: Privacy, Communications & Media, Consumer Protection, Litigation
Michelle’s unfailing dedication to her clients is evidenced by the fact that her first client, whom she worked with as a first-year associate over 20 years ago, remains an active client. She establishes strong and lasting relationships by committing herself to client service. Michelle understands her clients’ business goals, guides them in their use of new technologies, and communicates with them as their business activities unfold.. Michelle’s practice is focused on helping her clients establish powerful and lasting relationships with their customers and prospects. Whether engaging audiences through sweepstakes/contests, social networks, telemarketing, text, or email marketing, Michelle ensures that her clients’ communications comply with current marketing and privacy laws and regulations. For clients who have embraced the popularity of online promotions and gamification, Michelle keeps programs running smoothly by providing guidance on the necessary rules, thresholds and disclosures in the midst of a constantly changing legal landscape. As clients rely more on social media to publicize promotions, Michelle provides up-to-the minute legal counsel related to the rules on Twitter, Facebook and other social sites.. As Ifrah Law increasingly leads the way in iGaming, Michelle advises daily fantasy sports and e-Sports companies on privacy matters, including drafting online terms and conditions, and preparing legal opinions and analysis to support iGaming companies’ launching of their services, including working with payment processors.. When clients find themselves involved in an enforcement matter with the Federal Trade Commission, Federal Communications Commission or state agencies, Michelle’s deep knowledge in these areas and her strong footing in the privacy community help her to resolve issues in the most expedient manner possible. Michelle has extensive experience defending individual and class actions in the consumer protection context, including dozens of Telephone Consumer Protection Act cases. She obtained a rare rescission of an FCC citation in a TCPA enforcement matter.. Michelle also advises clients as to what policies and procedures can be put in place to show a company’s good faith efforts, should the government come knocking. When companies are involved in potential data or security breaches, Michelle knows which questions to ask to ensure they have a sound legal strategy. She works with the company step-by-step to resolve the situation from both the government’s, and her clients’ as well as their customers’ points of view.. Previously, Michelle was a partner at Thompson Hine where she was a member of their telecommunications, corporate transactions & securities and emerging technologies groups. She began her legal career in the litigation department at Paul Hastings, where she spent seven years honing her litigation skills, prior to moving into their corporate practice. Her litigation experience gives her a solid foundation for helping clients avoid litigation as well as in advising them when they are faced with litigation. This litigation experience, coupled with her regulatory and corporate experience, allow Michelle to offer her clients a full complement of services.
Avvo Review
“challenges effortlessly truly makes her an invaluable asset. I highly recommend Michelle.”
Po Box 146 , Washington , District of Columbia 20044
Practice Areas: Litigation
Lawyers.com Review
“I endorse this lawyer. Ms. Tinch has excellent communication and analytical skills. When you see her in her element, you are immediately the student and she the teacher.”
Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
