Top Criminal Defense Lawyers in Lakewood | 1 available

1 Criminal Defense lawyers are available in Lakewood, New Jersey, including Samuel Z. Brown. These lawyers are rated between 3.2/5 to 3.6/5 and 51% provide free consultation.

Samuel Z. Brow

Criminal Defense Lawyers Nearby Lakewood (by distance)

Within 10 miles near you

Tacoma, Washington ZIP 98405 5.7 mi away 24 lawyers Puyallup, Washington ZIP 98373 8.6 mi away 2 lawyers

Within 25 miles near you

Sumner, Washington ZIP 98390 13.4 mi away 2 lawyers Olympia, Washington ZIP 98501 21.5 mi away 16 lawyers Tukwila, Washington ZIP 98188 22.3 mi away 6 lawyers Renton, Washington ZIP 98057 25.0 mi away 9 lawyers

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

Samuel Z. Brown

Firm: Law Offices of Samuel Z. Brown, Professional Corporation

205 East Kennedy Boulevard New 08701 , Lakewood , New Jersey 08701

Practice Areas: Administrative ,Agricultural ,Animal Bites,Antitrust & Trade Regulation,Arbitration & Mediation,Asbestos ,Assault & Battery,Banking & Finance,Bankruptcy,Business & Commercial,Business Organizations,Civil Rights,Communications & Media ,Condemnation & Eminent Domain,Constitutional ,Construction ,Contracts,Criminal Defense ,Debtor/Creditor,Drugs & Medical Devices,Education ,Employment & Labor ,Estate Planning,Family ,Franchise ,Government Agencies,Health Care & Hospitalization,Housing & Construction Defects,Insurance ,Intellectual Property ,Land Use & Zoning,Landlord & Tenant,Motor Vehicle Accidents,Motor Vehicle Defects,Natural Resources,Patents,Personal Injury,Premises Liability,Probate ,Products Liability,Professional Malpractice,Real Estate ,Securities ,Taxation - State & Federal,Toxic Substances,Trademarks,Traffic Violations,Trusts,Wills,Wrongful Death

Describe Your Case — We'll Connect You With a Matching Lawyer

Save This Search

Recent Q&As in New Jersey (Criminal Defense)

NJ County truck hit a car and caused significant damage. Police report has the witness as the at fault driver. | Aug 8, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: New Jersey About a month ago my son in laws car was hit by a NJ county work truck. There was significant damage done to my son-in-law’s car. It’s basically smashed in on the back where the gas tank is and there’s no back tail light. The county truck was a fault and there was a witness present. The police were called. The witness provided his information. My son-in-law asked for the drivers information but was told it would be on the police report. When my son-in-law finally got the police report, he was shocked to see that the witness was listed as the at fault driver. There was no mention on the police report of the county truck being involved in the accident. My son-in-law has photos of the accident. He has reached out to the police multiple times, but they are ignoring his calls. He feels the falsified police report is an effort to obstruct his ability to get the car fixed. Especially as it has the witness as the driver. He is forced to drive a vehicle that honestly should not even be on the road. There’s so much damage to the back corner where the gas tank is. We are really concerned that he’s even in the most minor of accidents, there could be a fire. We believe he needs speak to an attorney and I was wondering if we could get any feedback on this.
NJ Restored My Eligibility for Jury Service After Two 20+ Year-Old Felony Convictions — But Other Civil Rights Remain Restricted. Is That Constitutionally Consistent? | Jul 24, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: New Jersey. New Jersey now requires me to serve on a jury despite continuing to deny me other civil rights because of a felony convictions that are over twenty years old and for which I've completed my sentence. I'm interested in exploring whether there's a viable constitutional challenge to the State restoring civic obligations while continuing to withhold other civil rights.

See more Q&A Ask a Lawyer (free)

You have reached the Last Page!

Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.