Firm: Elder Law Center of WI, LLC
Practice Areas: Elder Law
W. Ryan Zenk, JD, CFP ®. Chief Executive Officer. Practicing Since 1989, in the areas of:. Estate Planning. Elder Law. Charitable & Tax Planning. W. Ryan Zenk, JD, CFP® is a practicing Attorney with Elder Law Center of WI, LLC located in Wisconsin.. Mr. Zenk received his undergraduate and law degrees from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He is the author of "Your Life Your Legacy", a book on estate planning.. Ryan is a frequent speaker to professional and business groups, public and private, on the topics of estate planning, asset protection planning and successful investment strategies. His practice is based on a collaborative approach which values and requires the integration of his clients’ other professional advisors, namely CPA’s and Attorneys, to ensure the successful implementation clients’ tax, legal and financial planning.. For over the past 20 plus years, he has been helping people successfully plan for their retirement. His practice is now focused on estate planning, asset protection planning, Medicaid eligiblity, and geriatric care.
Contact: Not Available
Firm: Borgelt, Powell, Peterson and Frauen, S.C.
Practice Areas: Civil ,Insurance ,Products Liability
Contact: 414-276-3600
Practice Areas: Government, Family, General Practice
Firm: Siesennop & Sullivan LLP
1017 W Glen Oaks Ln Ste 201 , Mequon , Wisconsin 53092
Practice Areas: Arbitration & Mediation, Business , Civil , Construction , Insurance , Products Liability, Professional Malpractice, Insurance, Insurance, Insurance, Insurance, Insurance, Insurance, Insurance, Insurance, Insurance, Insurance, Insurance
Contact: +1 (414) 262-6277
Walden, Neitzke & Kuhary, S.C
Firm: Walden, Neitzke & Kuhary, S.C
707 W Moreland Blvd , Waukesha , Wisconsin 53188
Practice Areas: Divorce & Family, Business, Personal Injury
Contact: (262) 955-8330
Firm: Daubert Law Firm, LLC
Practice Areas: Employment, Health Care, Real Estate, Business, Employment & Labor
I have been in practice for over 40 years, both in private practice and as a corporate attorney for Pabst Brewing Company and Wausau Insurance/Liberty Mutual, and thus have acquired a broad range of experience in most areas of business, real estate, employment and health law.
Contact: Not Available
Walcheske & Luzi
Firm: Walcheske & Luzi
Practice Areas: Employment, General Litigation, Workers Compensation
Contact: (262) 780-1953
Practice Areas: Bankruptcy, Chapter 11, Chapter 13, Chapter 7, Foreclosure, Agriculture, Social Security & Disability
Contact: 608-467-0436
Practice Areas: Business
Contact: 414-277-5657
Firm: Janesville City Attorneys Office
Practice Areas: Government
Contact: Not Available
711 N Bridge St , Chippewa Falls , Wisconsin 54729
Contact: Not Available
Practice Areas: General Practice
Contact: 608-257-9521
Firm: Gorokhovsky Law Office, LLC
Practice Areas: Aviation
“Liability of Airline for Damages Caused by Delay or Cancellation of International Airfare”. Written by: Vladimir M. Gorokhovsky. Aviation & Passengers’ Rights Lawyer Pursuant to Article 19 of the Montreal Convention, an airline is strictly liable up to the sum of 4150 SDR (Special Drawing Rights) for damages sustained by a passenger as direct and proximate cause of delay or cancellation of international airfare. See, generally, Multilateral Convention for International Carriage by Air, Montreal, May 28, 1999., S. Treaty Doc. No. 106-45, reprinted in 1999 WL 33292734 (2000). This general rule of strict liability applies only to international flights and is subject to a few well recognized defenses (such as “climatic defense,” “act of God”, boycotts and etc.). Sometimes, it is possible to overcome the above-referenced cap on damages if facts will show reckless disregard on the part of airline. See, Kupferman v. Pakistan International Airlines, 108 Misc. 2d 485 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 1981)(holding that a fifteen-day delay in delivery of a plaintiff’s baggage is sufficient to demonstrate willful misconduct under the Warsaw Convention). Furthermore, the statute of limitation as set forth by Article 35(1) of the Montreal Convention is two (2) years. The Article states in pertinent part that “the right to damages shall be extinguished if an action is not brought within a period of two years, reckoned from the date of arrival at the destination, or from the date on which the aircraft ought to have arrived, or from the date on which the carriage stopped.” Id. Although terms of tariff filed by airline with DOT are generally binding upon a passenger, however, if tariff’s terms are conflicting with specific remedies afforded to international air passengers by the Montreal Convention, such conflicting terms of tariff will not be enforced. See, Muoneke v. Compagnie Nationale Air France, (. May 12, 2009). Unfortunately, majority of disputes arising between air passenger and an airline are unlikely to be resolved in passenger’s favor to fullest extent allowed by the Montreal Convention unless civil action for money damages is filed against an airline in a local federal district court within the state of passenger’s domicile. Importantly, civil action against airline filed in local state court will be swiftly removed by an airline to a federal district court because the Montreal Convention preempts state law claims against airlines with exception of breach of contract claim. American Airlines, Inc. v. Wolens, 115 S.Ct. 817, . 219, 130 L.Ed.2d 715, 63 USLW 4066 (U.S.Ill.,1995)(holding that Airline Deregulation Act did not preempt a civil action against airline based on state’s contract law theory). Thus, civil action against airline resulting from delay or cancellation of international airfare flight under auspices of Article 19 of the Montreal Convention shall be only filed in the federal district court having jurisdiction upon passenger’s state of domicile or a place where a contract of purchasing of airfare was formed. Cf, Narkiewicz-Laine v. Scandinavian Airlines Systems, 587 F. 888 (N.D.Ill., 2008). Although “purely emotional damages” such as damages for frustration, anguish, physical or mental upset independent of any physical injury may not be recovered under the Montreal Convention, see, e.g. Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. Floyd, 499 U.S. 530 (1991), nevertheless a courts have allowed recovery for physical and financial injuries, and even inconvenience. Daniel v. Virgin Atl. Airways Ltd, 59 F. Supp. 2d 986, 992 (N.D. Cal. 1998) (denying recovery for emotional injuries, but permitting claims for physical injuries and economic damages, including inconvenience); Ikekpeazu v. Air France, No. 3:04cv00711 (RNC), 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24580 4 (D. Conn. Dec. 6, 2004) (recognizing financial injury as a cognizable claim, but not emotional injury). Also, passenger may recover damages for economic loss under the Montreal Convention. See, e.g.,Ikekpeazu, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24580 at *4; Lee v. American Airlines, Inc., No. 3:01-CV-1179-P, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12029 at *13 (N.D. Tex. July 2, 2002), aff'd, 355 F.3d 386, 387 (5th Cir. Tex. 2004). Passenger can also recover loss of work damages resulting at financial injury as economic damages. See, Ikekpeazu, . Dist. LEXIS 24580 at *4. To evaluate potential claim against an airline resulting from delay or cancellation of international airfare it is advisable to consult with an attorney, who is specializing in enforcement of air passenger’s rights afforded to them by the Montreal Convention. Such “delay and cancellation” claims are handled by lawyers on contingency fees basis. Successful passenger can recover money damages up to 4694 SDR or approximately $6500 . Court’s costs are also recoverable but attorney’s fees generally are not recoverable with some very narrow exception. See, e.g. In re September 11 Litigation, 500 F. 356 (S.D.N.Y., 2007). Good luck and best regards.. Additional Resources * Multilateral Convention for International Carriage by Air, Montreal May 28, 1999., S. Treaty Doc. No. 106-45, reprinted in1999 WL 33292734 (2000).. * The Montreal Convention is available in the UNITED STATES CODE SERVICE (U.S.C.S.) volume titled International Agreements at 635 (2007). It is also available at S. Treaty Doc. No. 106-45, 1999 WL 33292734 at 29-45.. * Press Statement, United States Department of State, Ratification of the 1999 Montreal Convention (Sept. 5, 2003), available at ; Press Release, United States Department of Transportation, United States Ratifies 1999 Montreal Convention, Putting Treaty Into Effect (Sept. 5, 2003), available at affairs/.
Contact: Not Available
Firm: W E Hoard
Practice Areas: Estate Planning
Contact: (608) 365-3017
Firm: Siesennop and Sullivan
Practice Areas: Corporate ,Dental Malpractice,Insurance ,Medical Malpractice,Nursing Home Negligence,Products Liability,Real Estate
Contact: 414-223-7900
Firm: CNH Industrial
Practice Areas: Banking
Contact: Not Available
Practice Areas: Intellectual Property
Contact: 608-255-4440
Firm: Miller and Miller, LLC
311 DeWitt Street , Portage , Wisconsin 53901
Practice Areas: Business & Commercial,Civil ,Collections,Estate Planning,General Practice,Guardianship and Conservatorship,Municipal ,Probate ,Real Estate ,Wills
Contact: 608-742-8585
Firm: Terschan, Steinle, Hodan, & Ganzer Ltd
Practice Areas: Estate Planning, Family , Natural Resources, Real Estate , Litigation, Litigation, Litigation, Litigation, Litigation, Litigation, Litigation, Litigation, Litigation, Litigation
Contact: Not Available
Firm: Department of Workforce Development
Po Box 8928 , Madison , Wisconsin 53708
Practice Areas: Corporate & Incorporation
Contact: Not Available