Top consumer protection Lawyers in Santa Barbara | 3 available

3 consumer protection lawyers are available in Santa Barbara, california, including James Kelly Francis, Michael Ring, and Terry L. Baker. These lawyers are rated between 2.5/5 to 2.9/5 and 61% provide free consultation.

James Kelly Fr

Michael Ring

Terry L. Baker

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

Google Rating:

James Kelly Francis

Firm: Michael P. Ring & Associates

1234 Street , Santa Barbara , California 93101

Practice Areas: Animal Bites,Asbestos ,Assault & Battery,Banking & Finance,Business & Commercial,Business Organizations,Civil Rights,Constitutional ,Construction ,Consumer Protection,Contracts,Debtor/Creditor,Discrimination,Drugs & Medical Devices,Elder ,Employment & Labor ,Estate Planning,Franchise ,Government Agencies,Government Contracts,Health Care & Hospitalization,Housing & Construction Defects,Insurance ,Intellectual Property ,Labor ,Land Use & Zoning,Landlord & Tenant,Legal Malpractice,Lemon ,Medical Malpractice,Motor Vehicle Accidents,Motor Vehicle Defects,Patents,Personal Injury,Probate ,Products Liability,Professional Malpractice,Real Estate ,Securities ,Sexual Harassment,Toxic Substances,Trusts,Wills,Wrongful Death

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

Google Rating:

Michael Ring

Firm: Ring & Associates Attorneys At Law

1234 Santa Barbara Street , Santa Barbara , California 93101

Practice Areas: Animal Bites, Asbestos , Assault & Battery, Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy, Business & Commercial, Business Organizations, Civil Rights, Constitutional , Construction , Consumer Protection, Contracts, Debtor/Creditor, Discrimination, Drugs & Medical Devices, Elder , Employment & Labor , Entertainment & Sports , Environmental , Estate Planning, Franchise , Government Contracts, Health Care & Hospitalization, Housing & Construction Defects, Insurance , Intellectual Property , Labor , Land Use & Zoning, Landlord & Tenant, Lemon , Motor Vehicle Accidents, Motor Vehicle Defects, Patents, Personal Injury, Probate , Products Liability, Real Estate , Securities , Sexual Harassment, Toxic Substances, Trusts, Wills, Wrongful Death, Business

Lawyers.com Review

“I endorse this lawyer. Mr. Ring is a very knowledgeable and detail oriented attorney who provides outstanding legal service to each of his clients.”

Google Review

“Michael is professional and efficient. His legal knowledge and verbal skills make him a go to guy to get stuff handled.”

— Dana Ochoa

View Profile

Avvo Rating:

Google Rating:

Terry L. Baker

Firm: Makler & Baker L.L.P.

226 E Canon Perdido Street J , Santa Barbara , California 93101

Practice Areas: Consumer Protection

Avvo Review

“Having seen Mr. Baker in action I would be disgraced to ever use him again. He is rude, manipulative, and out for himself. He gives the legal communit...”

Read on Avvo

Describe Your Case — We'll Connect You With a Matching Lawyer

Save This Search

Recent Q&As in California (consumer protection)

Moving broker keeps delaying my deposit refund — what are my next steps? | Aug 22, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: CA/FL/NM I’m looking for advice on what my realistic next steps are regarding a refund dispute with a Florida-based interstate moving broker. In July, while I was still living in California, I booked an interstate move from San Diego, CA to Socorro, NM and paid a $700 deposit by ACH. The company contacted me with what appeared to be a good deal and told me the deposit was refundable. I was also told I needed to sign the contract right away to lock in the price, so I signed. Afterward, I did more research and found a large number of negative reviews about the company. My actual move was also still some time away, so I decided I had committed too early without doing enough research. The signed contract specifically states that if I cancel in writing within 72 hours of signing, the deposit is refundable minus a 5% cancellation fee. I submitted my written cancellation within that 72-hour period, so the amount I am owed is $665. It has now been over a month and I still have not received the refund. I have called and emailed repeatedly. Every time I call, I am told that the refund is “still processing,” but they will not give me a specific refund date, ACH trace number, transaction confirmation, or any other evidence that the refund has actually been issued. At one point they created an escalation ticket and asked me to wait for an update. I waited another week and…
How do I legally compel DoorDash to issue a refund in California? | Jul 22, 2026 | Sourced from Reddit
Location: Newport Beach, CA California passed a law this year that requires DoorDash to issue refunds for wrong orders, unless they find the request to be fraudulent. DoorDash issues me about one refund every 30 to 45 days and then automatically denies all future refund requests citing my refund history and their refund policy which says refunds are at DoorDash’s discretion and if any are Made, they are gratuitous. And I don’t need to be a lawyer to know that Laws precede Business Policies. Because I am disabled and rely on these services, I order on a daily basis and sometimes up to 2 to 3 times a day. Due to a high volume of orders, it only makes sense that theres a high volume of issues as well. out of a week I might have 14 to 20 orders and I might have one two or even three issues. I have started taking pictures and documenting them very well. DoorDash has refused all refunds. Yesterday I ordered broccoli beef, and I got shrimp and broccoli. I sent them very clear photos with the receipt and the packaging and the food. Sometimes the food doesn’t match the DoorDash description, and there are ingredients in there that I am sensitive to and can’t eat. The other restaurant sends me raw meat sitting on top of the rest of my noodles Without any warning that the meat would be raw while the pictures showed cooked meat. These are just some examples. This…

See more Q&A Ask a Lawyer (free)

You have reached the Last Page!

Disclaimer: This content is based on aggregated public information and estimated market trends. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.