Cal. BPC § 4955.1
This is the official text of Cal. BPC § 4955.1, part of California’s Business and Professions Code — regulates business practices and professional/occupational licensing - contractors, doctors, cosmetologists, real estate agents, and dozens of other licensed professions.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Official statutory text
The board may deny, suspend, revoke, or impose probationary conditions upon the license of any acupuncturist if he or she is guilty of committing a fraudulent act including, but not be limited to, any of the following:
(a) Securing a license by fraud or deceit.
(b) Committing a fraudulent or dishonest act as an acupuncturist.
(c) Committing any act involving dishonesty or corruption with respect to the qualifications, functions, or duties of an acupuncturist.
(d) Altering or modifying the medical record of any person, with fraudulent intent, or creating any false medical record.
(e) Failing to maintain adequate and accurate records relating to the provision of services to their patients.
(a) Securing a license by fraud or deceit.
(b) Committing a fraudulent or dishonest act as an acupuncturist.
(c) Committing any act involving dishonesty or corruption with respect to the qualifications, functions, or duties of an acupuncturist.
(d) Altering or modifying the medical record of any person, with fraudulent intent, or creating any false medical record.
(e) Failing to maintain adequate and accurate records relating to the provision of services to their patients.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in California?
Find a California lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.