Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42a-1-308
This is the official text of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42a-1-308, part of Connecticut’s Gen. Stat — part of the compiled statutory law of Connecticut, published by the state as "Gen. Stat." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Sec. 42a-1-308. Performance or acceptance under reservation of rights.
Official statutory text
(b) Subsection (a) of this section does not apply to an accord and satisfaction.
Subsec. (a):
The trial court's finding that plaintiffs who waived the minimum purchase requirement for the 3rd through 5th contract years did not indicate their intent to reserve their rights as to those or subsequent contract years and thus waived said requirement in the 6th contract year was not clearly erroneous; the obligee bears the risk of any ambiguity arising from its failure to clearly announce whether its decision repeatedly to waive those rights is to be construed as a continuing waiver. 318 C. 737.
Subsec. (a):
The trial court's finding that plaintiffs who waived the minimum purchase requirement for the 3rd through 5th contract years did not indicate their intent to reserve their rights as to those or subsequent contract years and thus waived said requirement in the 6th contract year was not clearly erroneous; the obligee bears the risk of any ambiguity arising from its failure to clearly announce whether its decision repeatedly to waive those rights is to be construed as a continuing waiver. 318 C. 737.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Connecticut?
Find a Connecticut lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.