Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-147e
This is the official text of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 7-147e, part of Connecticut’s Gen. Stat — part of the compiled statutory law of Connecticut, published by the state as "Gen. Stat." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Sec. 7-147e. Application for certificate. Hearing. Approval.
Official statutory text
(b) Unless otherwise provided by ordinance, a majority of the members of the commission shall constitute a quorum and the concurring vote of a majority of the members of the commission shall be necessary to issue a certificate of appropriateness. Within not more than sixty-five days after the filing of an application as required by section 7-147d , the commission shall pass upon such application and shall give written notice of its decision to the applicant. When a certificate of appropriateness is denied, the commission shall place upon its records and in the notice to the applicant the reasons for its determination, which shall include the bases for its conclusion that the proposed activity would not be appropriate. In the notice to the applicant the commission may make recommendations relative to design, arrangement, texture, material and similar features. The commission may issue a certificate of appropriateness with stipulations. Evidence of approval, as referred to in section 7-147d , shall be by certificate of appropriateness issued by the commission. Failure of the commission to act within said sixty-five days shall constitute approval and no other evidence of approval shall be needed.
Cited. 153 C. 160; 171 C. 199; 189 C. 727; 196 C. 596.
Subsec. (a):
Failure to republish notice of continuance of a hearing in newspaper did not violate Subsec. 49 CS 498.
Subsec. (b):
In appeal from a decision by historic district commission, reviewing courts are limited to determining whether reason or reasons stated by commission are supported by substantial evidence in the record. 285 C. 755.
Although commission mailed notice of denial of the application to applicant 68 days after filing of the application, applicant was not entitled to automatic approval of the application on that basis since commission had acted within 65 days after filing of the application and applicant had actual notice of the commission's decision. 108 CA 682.
Cited. 153 C. 160; 171 C. 199; 189 C. 727; 196 C. 596.
Subsec. (a):
Failure to republish notice of continuance of a hearing in newspaper did not violate Subsec. 49 CS 498.
Subsec. (b):
In appeal from a decision by historic district commission, reviewing courts are limited to determining whether reason or reasons stated by commission are supported by substantial evidence in the record. 285 C. 755.
Although commission mailed notice of denial of the application to applicant 68 days after filing of the application, applicant was not entitled to automatic approval of the application on that basis since commission had acted within 65 days after filing of the application and applicant had actual notice of the commission's decision. 108 CA 682.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Connecticut?
Find a Connecticut lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.