D.C. Code § 38-192.03
This is the official text of D.C. Code § 38-192.03, part of District of Columbia’s Code — part of the compiled statutory law of District of Columbia, published by the state as "Code." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
§ 38-192.03. Dual-language program feasibility study.
Official statutory text
(a) By January 1, 2026, the Deputy Mayor for Education ("DME") shall complete a feasibility study for the development and operation of a new dual-language education program or dual-language education school, located in Ward 6, 7, or 8, and serving grades 6 through 8.
(b) The study shall:
(1) Consider the feasibility of:
(A) Using the Winston Education Campus as a site for a dual-language education program or a school that hosts a dual-language education program;
(B) Embedding a dual-language education program into an existing middle school in Ward 6, 7, or 8, including Kelly Miller Middle School, Kramer Middle School, Sousa Middle School, and Jefferson Academy Middle School;
(C) Utilizing the Shirley Chisholm Elementary School modernization to establish a dual-language education campus at Shirley Chisholm Elementary School; and
(D) Incorporating Ward 6, 7, and 8 dual-language education public charter school elementary schools without an existing or nearby middle school feeder into a District of Columbia Public Schools dual-language education program or middle school feeder pattern;
(2) Assess the feasibility of each option in paragraph (1) of this subsection based on the following considerations:
(A) Capital and operational costs;
(B) Staffing requirements and models;
(C) The transportation time of the students and families likely to attend the new school or program;
(D) The impact on enrollment patterns of the elementary and middle schools in the proposed or existing feeder patterns; and
(E) Enrollment trends of English learners, by in-boundary and out-of-boundary status, to attend such a dual-language program or school;
ng requirements and models;
(C) The transportation time of the students and families likely to attend the new school or program;
(D) The impact on enrollment patterns of the elementary and middle schools in the proposed or existing feeder patterns; and
(E) Enrollment trends of English learners, by in-boundary and out-of-boundary status, to attend such a dual-language program or school;
(3) Analyze the demand in Wards 7 and 8 for a dual-language education middle-grade option, which shall include:
(A) The number of students living in Wards 7 and 8 who attend a dual-language elementary school in the District outside of those wards; and
(B) The number of families living in Wards 7 and 8 waitlisted at dual-language elementary schools in the District outside of those wards over the last 5 school years; and
(4) Propose timelines for implementing the 3 most feasible options for a dual-language education program or school located in Ward 6, 7, or 8, serving grades 6 through 8.
(c) For purposes of this section, the term "dual-language education" means a course of study where students study grade-level content in English and another language, including Spanish.
(b) The study shall:
(1) Consider the feasibility of:
(A) Using the Winston Education Campus as a site for a dual-language education program or a school that hosts a dual-language education program;
(B) Embedding a dual-language education program into an existing middle school in Ward 6, 7, or 8, including Kelly Miller Middle School, Kramer Middle School, Sousa Middle School, and Jefferson Academy Middle School;
(C) Utilizing the Shirley Chisholm Elementary School modernization to establish a dual-language education campus at Shirley Chisholm Elementary School; and
(D) Incorporating Ward 6, 7, and 8 dual-language education public charter school elementary schools without an existing or nearby middle school feeder into a District of Columbia Public Schools dual-language education program or middle school feeder pattern;
(2) Assess the feasibility of each option in paragraph (1) of this subsection based on the following considerations:
(A) Capital and operational costs;
(B) Staffing requirements and models;
(C) The transportation time of the students and families likely to attend the new school or program;
(D) The impact on enrollment patterns of the elementary and middle schools in the proposed or existing feeder patterns; and
(E) Enrollment trends of English learners, by in-boundary and out-of-boundary status, to attend such a dual-language program or school;
ng requirements and models;
(C) The transportation time of the students and families likely to attend the new school or program;
(D) The impact on enrollment patterns of the elementary and middle schools in the proposed or existing feeder patterns; and
(E) Enrollment trends of English learners, by in-boundary and out-of-boundary status, to attend such a dual-language program or school;
(3) Analyze the demand in Wards 7 and 8 for a dual-language education middle-grade option, which shall include:
(A) The number of students living in Wards 7 and 8 who attend a dual-language elementary school in the District outside of those wards; and
(B) The number of families living in Wards 7 and 8 waitlisted at dual-language elementary schools in the District outside of those wards over the last 5 school years; and
(4) Propose timelines for implementing the 3 most feasible options for a dual-language education program or school located in Ward 6, 7, or 8, serving grades 6 through 8.
(c) For purposes of this section, the term "dual-language education" means a course of study where students study grade-level content in English and another language, including Spanish.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in District of Columbia?
Find a District of Columbia lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.