D.C. Code § 41-160.05
This is the official text of D.C. Code § 41-160.05, part of District of Columbia’s Code — part of the compiled statutory law of District of Columbia, published by the state as "Code." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
§ 41-160.05. Evidence of unpaid debt or undischarged obligation.
Official statutory text
(a) A record of a putative holder showing an unpaid debt or undischarged obligation is prima facie evidence of the debt or obligation.
(b) A putative holder may establish by a preponderance of the evidence that there is no unpaid debt or undischarged obligation for a debt or obligation described in subsection (a) of this section or that the debt or obligation was not, or no longer is, a fixed and certain obligation of the putative holder.
(c) A putative holder may overcome prima facie evidence under subsection (a) of this section by establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that a check, draft, or similar instrument was:
(1) Issued as an unaccepted offer in settlement of an unliquidated amount;
(2) Issued but later was replaced with another instrument because the earlier instrument was lost or contained an error that was corrected;
(3) Issued to a party affiliated with the issuer;
(4) Paid, satisfied, or discharged;
(5) Issued in error;
(6) Issued without consideration;
(7) Issued but there was a failure of consideration;
(8) Voided not later than 90 days after issuance for a valid business reason set forth in a contemporaneous record; or
(9) Issued but not delivered to the third-party payee for a sufficient reason recorded within a reasonable time after issuance.
(d) In asserting a defense under this section, a putative holder may present evidence of a course of dealing between the putative holder and the apparent owner or of custom and practice.
(b) A putative holder may establish by a preponderance of the evidence that there is no unpaid debt or undischarged obligation for a debt or obligation described in subsection (a) of this section or that the debt or obligation was not, or no longer is, a fixed and certain obligation of the putative holder.
(c) A putative holder may overcome prima facie evidence under subsection (a) of this section by establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that a check, draft, or similar instrument was:
(1) Issued as an unaccepted offer in settlement of an unliquidated amount;
(2) Issued but later was replaced with another instrument because the earlier instrument was lost or contained an error that was corrected;
(3) Issued to a party affiliated with the issuer;
(4) Paid, satisfied, or discharged;
(5) Issued in error;
(6) Issued without consideration;
(7) Issued but there was a failure of consideration;
(8) Voided not later than 90 days after issuance for a valid business reason set forth in a contemporaneous record; or
(9) Issued but not delivered to the third-party payee for a sufficient reason recorded within a reasonable time after issuance.
(d) In asserting a defense under this section, a putative holder may present evidence of a course of dealing between the putative holder and the apparent owner or of custom and practice.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in District of Columbia?
Find a District of Columbia lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.