Fla. Stat. § 61.739
This is the official text of Fla. Stat. § 61.739, part of Florida’s Stat — part of the compiled statutory law of Florida, published by the state as "Stat." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
61.739 Grant of temporary caretaking authority to nonparent.
Official statutory text
(1) Upon the motion of a deploying parent and in accordance with general law, if it is in the best interest of the child, a court may grant temporary caretaking authority to a nonparent who is an adult family member of the child or an adult who is not a family member with whom the child has a close and substantial relationship. In the case of an adult who is not a family member with whom the child has a close and substantial relationship, the best interest of the child must be established by clear and convincing evidence.
(2) Unless a grant of caretaking authority to a nonparent is agreed to by the other parent, the grant is limited to an amount of time that may not exceed: (a) The amount of time granted to the deploying parent under a permanent custody order; however, the court may add travel time necessary to transport the child; or (b) In the absence of a permanent custody order that is currently in effect, the amount of time the deploying parent habitually cared for the child before being notified of deployment; however, the court may add travel time necessary to transport the child.
(3) If, due to the operational constraints of the deployment, or a portion thereof, the deploying parent is unable to exercise decisionmaking authority and if it is in the best interest of the child, a court may grant part of that authority to a nonparent who is an adult family member of the child or an adult who is not a family member with whom the child has a close and substantial relationship. In the case of an adult who is not a family member with whom the child has a close and substantial relationship, the best interest of the child must be established by clear and convincing evidence. A grant of decisionmaking authority to a nonparent must be narrowly drawn to the reasonably foreseeable needs of the child during the time that the deploying parent is unable to exercise such authority and must consider the role of the other parent. If a court grants the authority to a nonparent, the court shall specify the decisionmaking powers granted and the duration of such grant, which shall not exceed the length of time in which the deploying parent is unable to exercise decisionmaking authority. Except as otherwise specified in this subsection, the deploying parent retains his or her decisionmaking authority for the child during deployment.
History: s. 1, ch. 2018-69.
(2) Unless a grant of caretaking authority to a nonparent is agreed to by the other parent, the grant is limited to an amount of time that may not exceed: (a) The amount of time granted to the deploying parent under a permanent custody order; however, the court may add travel time necessary to transport the child; or (b) In the absence of a permanent custody order that is currently in effect, the amount of time the deploying parent habitually cared for the child before being notified of deployment; however, the court may add travel time necessary to transport the child.
(3) If, due to the operational constraints of the deployment, or a portion thereof, the deploying parent is unable to exercise decisionmaking authority and if it is in the best interest of the child, a court may grant part of that authority to a nonparent who is an adult family member of the child or an adult who is not a family member with whom the child has a close and substantial relationship. In the case of an adult who is not a family member with whom the child has a close and substantial relationship, the best interest of the child must be established by clear and convincing evidence. A grant of decisionmaking authority to a nonparent must be narrowly drawn to the reasonably foreseeable needs of the child during the time that the deploying parent is unable to exercise such authority and must consider the role of the other parent. If a court grants the authority to a nonparent, the court shall specify the decisionmaking powers granted and the duration of such grant, which shall not exceed the length of time in which the deploying parent is unable to exercise decisionmaking authority. Except as otherwise specified in this subsection, the deploying parent retains his or her decisionmaking authority for the child during deployment.
History: s. 1, ch. 2018-69.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Florida?
Find a Florida lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.