Idaho Code § 15-3-309
This is the official text of Idaho Code § 15-3-309, part of Idaho’s Code — part of the compiled statutory law of Idaho, published by the state as "Code." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
15-3-309 INFORMAL APPOINTMENT PROCEEDINGS — REGISTRAR NOT SATISFIED.
Official statutory text
PART 3.
INFORMAL PROBATE AND APPOINTMENT PROCEEDINGS
15-3-309. Informal appointment proceedings — Registrar not satisfied. If the registrar is not satisfied that a requested informal appointment of a personal representative should be made because of failure to meet the requirements of sections 15-3-307 and 15-3-308 of this Part, or for any other reason, he may decline the application. A declination of informal appointment is not an adjudication and does not preclude appointment in formal proceedings.
History:
[I.C., sec. 15-3-309, as added by 1971, ch. 111, sec. 1, p. 233.]
INFORMAL PROBATE AND APPOINTMENT PROCEEDINGS
15-3-309. Informal appointment proceedings — Registrar not satisfied. If the registrar is not satisfied that a requested informal appointment of a personal representative should be made because of failure to meet the requirements of sections 15-3-307 and 15-3-308 of this Part, or for any other reason, he may decline the application. A declination of informal appointment is not an adjudication and does not preclude appointment in formal proceedings.
History:
[I.C., sec. 15-3-309, as added by 1971, ch. 111, sec. 1, p. 233.]
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Idaho?
Find a Idaho lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.