Internal prototype — noindexed, not linked from public navigation yet.

La. Ch. Code art. 630

This is the official text of La. Ch. Code art. 630, part of Louisiana’s Children's Code — governs child custody, child protection, and juvenile justice in Louisiana.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Effect of an agreement

Official statutory text

A. An informal adjustment agreement shall not be considered an adjudication. Evidence of such an agreement shall not be admissible in any adjudication hearing or criminal trial.

B. An informal adjustment agreement suspends the proceedings on the acts alleged in the child in need of care petition. If any of the terms of the agreement are violated, the case may proceed to an adjudication hearing on the allegations. If the parent satisfies the terms of the agreement, he shall be discharged from further supervision, and the pending complaint or petition shall be dismissed with prejudice.

C. An informal adjustment agreement does not suspend the elapse of time authorizing pursuit of termination of parental rights consistent with Title X. Evidence of an agreement and the parent's compliance or lack thereof may be admissible in a certification for adoption proceeding.

D. Any incriminating statement made by the parent to the person giving counsel or advice and in the discussions or conferences incident to the informal adjustment agreement shall not be used against the declarant over objection in an adjudication hearing or criminal trial. Any such statement may be used in a disposition hearing in the court or for the purpose of a presentence investigation after a criminal conviction.

Acts 1991, No. 235, §6, eff. Jan. 1, 1992; Acts 2001, No. 567, §1.

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.