La. Code Evid. art. 518
This is the official text of La. Code Evid. art. 518, part of Louisiana’s Code of Evidence — sets the rules for what evidence is admissible in Louisiana courts.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Trained peer support member privilege
Official statutory text
A.(1) A trained peer support member shall not, without consent of the emergency responder making the communication, be compelled to testify about any communication made to the trained peer support member by the emergency responder while receiving peer support services. The trained peer support member shall be designated as such by the emergency service agency or entity, prior to the incident that results in receiving peer support services. The privilege only applies when the communication was made to the trained peer support member.
(2) The privilege does not apply to any of the following if:
(a) The trained peer support member was an initial responding emergency responder, a witness, or a party to the incident which prompted the delivery of peer support services to the emergency responder.
(b) A communication reveals the intended commission of a crime or harmful act and such disclosure is determined to be necessary by the trained peer support member to protect any person from a clear, imminent risk of serious mental or physical harm or injury, or to forestall a serious threat to the public safety.
B. For purposes of this Section, a "trained peer support member" is any of the following persons or entities that provide emotional and moral support or counseling to an emergency responder who needs those services as a result of an incident in which the emergency responder was involved while acting in his official capacity:
(1) An emergency responder or civilian volunteer of an emergency service agency or entity, who has received training in Critical Incident Stress Management.
(2) A volunteer counselor or other mental health services provider who has been designated by the emergency service agency or entity.
(3) A firefighter who has received peer support training from the International Association of Fire Fighters.
Acts 2003, No. 1137, §1; Acts 2023, No. 23, §1.
(2) The privilege does not apply to any of the following if:
(a) The trained peer support member was an initial responding emergency responder, a witness, or a party to the incident which prompted the delivery of peer support services to the emergency responder.
(b) A communication reveals the intended commission of a crime or harmful act and such disclosure is determined to be necessary by the trained peer support member to protect any person from a clear, imminent risk of serious mental or physical harm or injury, or to forestall a serious threat to the public safety.
B. For purposes of this Section, a "trained peer support member" is any of the following persons or entities that provide emotional and moral support or counseling to an emergency responder who needs those services as a result of an incident in which the emergency responder was involved while acting in his official capacity:
(1) An emergency responder or civilian volunteer of an emergency service agency or entity, who has received training in Critical Incident Stress Management.
(2) A volunteer counselor or other mental health services provider who has been designated by the emergency service agency or entity.
(3) A firefighter who has received peer support training from the International Association of Fire Fighters.
Acts 2003, No. 1137, §1; Acts 2023, No. 23, §1.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Louisiana?
Find a Louisiana lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.