Internal prototype — noindexed, not linked from public navigation yet.

Md. Code, Commercial Law § 14-1313

This is the official text of Md. Code, Commercial Law § 14-1313, part of Maryland’s Code, Commercial Law — governs commercial transactions - Maryland's version of the Uniform Commercial Code.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

§14–1313.

Official statutory text

(a) (1) In this section the following words have the meanings indicated.

(2) (i) “Commercial solicitation” means the unsolicited electronic or telephonic transmission in the State to a facsimile device to encourage a person to purchase goods, realty, or services.

(ii) “Commercial solicitation” does not include:

1. An electronic or telephonic transmission made in the course of prior negotiations; or

2. An electronic or telephonic transmission made in the course of a preexisting business relationship with the person receiving the transmission.

(3) “Facsimile device” means a machine that receives and copies reproductions or facsimiles of documents or photographs that have been transmitted electronically or telephonically over telecommunications lines.

(b) A person may not make intentionally an electronic or telephonic transmission to a facsimile device for the purpose of commercial solicitation.

(c) (1) The Attorney General may initiate a civil action against any person who violates this section to recover for the State a penalty not to exceed $1,000 for each violation.

(2) For the purposes of this section, each prohibited commercial solicitation is a separate violation.

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.