Md. Code, State Finance and Procurement § 15-219.1
This is the official text of Md. Code, State Finance and Procurement § 15-219.1, part of Maryland’s Code, State Finance and Procurement — governs the state budget and government contracting.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
§15–219.
Official statutory text
§15–219.1.
(a) (1) A unit may assert a contract claim against a contractor by sending written notice to the contractor and the procurement officer that states:
(i) the basis for the contract claim;
(ii) to the extent known, the amount, or the performance or other action, requested by the unit in the contract claim; and
(iii) the date by which the contractor is required to provide a written response to the contract claim.
(2) On receipt of a contract claim from a unit, a procurement officer:
(i) shall review the substance of the contract claim;
(ii) may request additional information or substantiation through an appropriate procedure; and
(iii) may discuss or, if appropriate, negotiate the contract claim with the unit or contractor.
(3) The procurement officer shall proceed under subsection (b) of this section if the contractor fails to respond, provides an inadequate response, or denies the contract claim or the relief sought by the unit in whole or in part.
(b) (1) If the contractor and the unit do not resolve the contract claim, the procurement officer shall prepare a proposed decision on the contract claim, including:
(i) a description of the contract claim;
(ii) references to pertinent contract provisions;
(iii) a statement of factual areas of agreement or disagreement; and
(iv) a statement in the proposed decision wholly or partly granting or denying the relief sought, with supporting rationale.
(2) Unless otherwise provided by regulation, the procurement officer shall submit the contract claim and proposed decision to:
(i) the head of the unit; and
(ii) the head of the principal department or other equivalent unit of which the unit is a part.
(3) (i) The reviewing authority shall approve, modify, or disapprove the proposed decision.
(ii) In disapproving a proposed decision, the reviewing authority may remand the contract claim with instructions to the procurement officer.
(iii) On remand, the procurement officer shall proceed as required under this subsection and in accordance with the instructions of the reviewing authority.
(4) The decision of the reviewing authority is the final action of the unit.
(a) (1) A unit may assert a contract claim against a contractor by sending written notice to the contractor and the procurement officer that states:
(i) the basis for the contract claim;
(ii) to the extent known, the amount, or the performance or other action, requested by the unit in the contract claim; and
(iii) the date by which the contractor is required to provide a written response to the contract claim.
(2) On receipt of a contract claim from a unit, a procurement officer:
(i) shall review the substance of the contract claim;
(ii) may request additional information or substantiation through an appropriate procedure; and
(iii) may discuss or, if appropriate, negotiate the contract claim with the unit or contractor.
(3) The procurement officer shall proceed under subsection (b) of this section if the contractor fails to respond, provides an inadequate response, or denies the contract claim or the relief sought by the unit in whole or in part.
(b) (1) If the contractor and the unit do not resolve the contract claim, the procurement officer shall prepare a proposed decision on the contract claim, including:
(i) a description of the contract claim;
(ii) references to pertinent contract provisions;
(iii) a statement of factual areas of agreement or disagreement; and
(iv) a statement in the proposed decision wholly or partly granting or denying the relief sought, with supporting rationale.
(2) Unless otherwise provided by regulation, the procurement officer shall submit the contract claim and proposed decision to:
(i) the head of the unit; and
(ii) the head of the principal department or other equivalent unit of which the unit is a part.
(3) (i) The reviewing authority shall approve, modify, or disapprove the proposed decision.
(ii) In disapproving a proposed decision, the reviewing authority may remand the contract claim with instructions to the procurement officer.
(iii) On remand, the procurement officer shall proceed as required under this subsection and in accordance with the instructions of the reviewing authority.
(4) The decision of the reviewing authority is the final action of the unit.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in Maryland?
Find a Maryland lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.