Internal prototype — noindexed, not linked from public navigation yet.

N.Y. CPL Law § 700.40

This is the official text of N.Y. CPL Law § 700.40, part of New York’s CPL Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "CPL Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Eavesdropping and video surveillance warrants; order of extension

Official statutory text

§ 700.40 Eavesdropping and video surveillance warrants; order of\n extension.\n At any time prior to the expiration of an eavesdropping or video\nsurveillance warrant, the applicant may apply to the issuing justice,\nor, if he is unavailable, to another justice, for an order of extension.\nThe period of extension shall be no longer than the justice deems\nnecessary to achieve the purposes for which it was granted and in no\nevent longer than thirty days. The application for an order of\nextension must conform in all respects to the provisions of section\n700.20 and, in addition, must contain a statement setting forth the\nresults thus far obtained from the interception, or a reasonable\nexplanation of the failure to obtain such results. The provisions of\nsections 700.15 and 700.25 are applicable in the determination of such\napplication. The order of extension must conform in all respects to the\nprovisions of section 700.30. In the execution of such order of\nextension the provisions of section 700.35 are applicable.\n

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in New York?

Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.