N.Y. CVP Law § 1337
This is the official text of N.Y. CVP Law § 1337, part of New York’s CVP Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "CVP Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Ascertaining damages sustained by reason of preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order
Official statutory text
§ 1337. Ascertaining damages sustained by reason of preliminary\ninjunction or temporary restraining order. The damages sustained by\nreason of a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order may be\nascertained upon motion on such notice to all interested persons as the\ncourt shall direct. Where the defendant enjoined was an officer of a\ncorporation or joint-stock association or a representative of another\nperson, the damages sustained by such corporation, association or person\nrepresented, to the amount of such excess, may also be ascertained. The\namount of damages so ascertained is conclusive upon all persons who were\nserved with notice of the motion and such amount may be recovered by the\nperson entitled thereto in a separate action. In order to establish the\nclaiming authority's liability for damages, the person seeking such\ndamages must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that, in causing\nthe temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction to be granted,\nthe claiming authority acted without reasonable cause and not in good\nfaith.\n
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in New York?
Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.