Internal prototype — noindexed, not linked from public navigation yet.

N.Y. CVR Law § 26

This is the official text of N.Y. CVR Law § 26, part of New York’s CVR Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "CVR Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Action against officer making arrest of exempt person

Official statutory text

§ 26. Action against officer making arrest of exempt person. An action\nmay be maintained, by the person arrested, against the officer or other\nperson making an arrest contrary to the provisions of the last section,\nin which the plaintiff is entitled to recover treble damages. A similar\naction may also be maintained, in a like case, by the party in whose\nbehalf the witness was subpoenaed, or the order procured, to recover the\ndamages sustained by him, in consequence of the arrest. But a sheriff,\nor other officer, or person, is not so liable, unless the person\nclaiming an exemption from arrest, makes, if required by the sheriff or\nofficer, an affidavit, to the effect that he was legally subpoenaed or\nordered to attend, and that he was not so subpoenaed or ordered by his\nown procurement, with the intent of avoiding arrest. In his affidavit he\nmust specify the court or officer, the place of attendance, and the\ncause in which he was so subpoenaed or ordered. The affidavit may be\ntaken before the officer arresting him, and exonerates the officer from\nliability for not making the arrest.\n

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in New York?

Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.