N.Y. CVR Law § 82
This is the official text of N.Y. CVR Law § 82, part of New York’s CVR Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "CVR Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Causing payment, satisfaction, settlement or compromise unlawful; instruments void
Official statutory text
§ 82. Causing payment, satisfaction, settlement or compromise\nunlawful; instruments void. Any contract or instrument executed after\nMarch twenty-ninth, nineteen hundred thirty-five, within this state in\npayment, satisfaction, settlement or compromise of any claim or cause of\naction abolished by this article, whether such claim or cause of action\narose within or without this state, is contrary to the public policy of\nthis state and absolutely void. It shall be unlawful to cause, induce or\nprocure any person to execute such a contract or instrument; or to\nreceive, take or accept any money or thing of value, or cause, induce or\nprocure any person to give, pay, transfer or deliver any money or thing\nof value, in payment, satisfaction, settlement or compromise of any such\nclaim or cause of action. It shall be unlawful to commence or cause to\nbe commenced, either as party or attorney, or in behalf of either, in\nany court of this state, any proceeding or action seeking to enforce or\nrecover upon any such contract or instrument, knowing it to be such,\nwhether it was executed within or without this state.\n
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in New York?
Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.