Internal prototype — noindexed, not linked from public navigation yet.

N.Y. JUD Law § 491

This is the official text of N.Y. JUD Law § 491, part of New York’s JUD Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "JUD Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Sharing of compensation by attorneys prohibited

Official statutory text

§ 491. Sharing of compensation by attorneys prohibited. 1. It shall be\nunlawful for any person, partnership, corporation, or association to\ndivide with or receive from, or to agree to divide with or receive from,\nany attorney-at-law or group of attorneys-at-law, whether practicing in\nthis state or elsewhere, either before or after action brought, any\nportion of any fee or compensation, charged or received by such\nattorney-at-law or any valuable consideration or reward, as an\ninducement for placing, or in consideration of having placed, in the\nhands of such attorney-at-law, or in the hands of another person, a\nclaim or demand of any kind for the purpose of collecting such claim, or\nbringing an action thereon, or of representing claimant in the pursuit\nof any civil remedy for the recovery thereof. But this section does not\napply to an agreement between attorneys and counsellors-at-law to divide\nbetween themselves the compensation to be received.\n 2. Any person violating any of the provisions of this section is\nguilty of a misdemeanor.\n

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in New York?

Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.