Internal prototype — noindexed, not linked from public navigation yet.

N.Y. JUD Law § 99-A

This is the official text of N.Y. JUD Law § 99-A, part of New York’s JUD Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "JUD Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Appointment of employees of appellate divisions in the third and fourth departments

Official statutory text

§ 99-a. Appointment of employees of appellate divisions in the third\nand fourth departments. The justices of the appellate division of the\nsupreme court in the third and fourth departments, or a majority of\nthem, are authorized to appoint and at pleasure remove not more than two\nadditional employees, than are employed at the time this act takes\neffect, to prescribe the duties and fix the salaries thereof. Except as\nprovided in the state finance law, such salaries shall be certified by\nthe appropriate presiding justice of each such appellate division to the\nstate comptroller who shall audit the same. The state department of\ntaxation and finance shall pay such salaries in equal semi-monthly\ninstalments, and shall apportion the total amount thereof among the\ncounties comprising the appropriate judicial department. Such counties\nshall reimburse the state for such salaries. The time and method of such\napportionment and the time and method of such reimbursement shall be as\nspecified in section seventy-four of this chapter.\n

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in New York?

Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.