Internal prototype — noindexed, not linked from public navigation yet.

N.Y. PBH Law § 1399-TT

This is the official text of N.Y. PBH Law § 1399-TT, part of New York’s PBH Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "PBH Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Regulations

Official statutory text

§ 1399-tt. Regulations. The commissioner shall make regulations, under\nthis article, governing the use of sharps in health care for the purpose\nof: preventing sharps injuries, reducing exposure incidents, and\npromoting the use of safer technologies which include engineered sharps\ninjury protections. Dentists licensed in this state, under title eight\nof the education law, shall be exempt from the regulations under this\narticle. Regulations under this article shall prohibit the use of sharps\nthat do not incorporate engineered sharps injury protections. The\nregulations may provide exceptions permitting the use of sharps without\nengineered sharps injury protections under circumstances where:\n (a) appropriate engineered sharps are not available in the market;\n (b) the use of sharps without engineered sharps injury protections is\nessential to the performance of a specific medical procedure; or\n (c) based on objective product evaluation, sharps with engineered\ninjury protections are not more effective in preventing exposure\nincidents than sharps without engineered injury protections.\n

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in New York?

Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.