Internal prototype — noindexed, not linked from public navigation yet.

N.Y. SCT Law § 61

This is the official text of N.Y. SCT Law § 61, part of New York’s SCT Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "SCT Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Costs and allowances

Official statutory text

§ 61. Costs and allowances. The court may in its discretion designate\nthe sheriff of Suffolk county as the officer to make the sale of real\nproperty in any action or proceeding brought as herein provided, and the\nsheriff shall serve without charge. Unless the judgment otherwise\ndirects, the officer making the sale must, out of the proceeds, first\npay, as a part of the expenses of the sale, all taxes and assessments\nwhich are liens upon the property sold, and which have become such prior\nto or subsequent to the filing of notice of pendency of the action, and\nredeem the property sold from any sales for unpaid taxes and\nassessments, which were had subsequent to the filing of such notice of\npendency of action. The plaintiff's costs and allowances, exclusive of\ndisbursements, shall be the same as the costs and allowances now\nprovided by the civil practice act and rules of procedure in the case of\nforeclosure of mortgages on real estate by action, except that there\nshall be no allowances by statute or by the court unless the amount\nrecovered is in excess of five hundred dollars.\n

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in New York?

Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.