Internal prototype — noindexed, not linked from public navigation yet.

Statutes » New York » SOS Law » Article 5

N.Y. SOS Law § 366-H

This is the official text of N.Y. SOS Law § 366-H, part of New York’s SOS Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "SOS Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Automated system; established

Official statutory text

§ 366-h. Automated system; established. Notwithstanding any\ninconsistent provision of law or regulation, the commissioner of health\nshall, as soon as practicable, establish an automated system to ensure\nthat persons who meet the criteria for receipt of medical assistance\nbenefits under paragraph (a) or (c) of subdivision four of section three\nhundred sixty-six of this title shall remain enrolled in the medical\nassistance program without interruption and receive the benefits set\nforth according to paragraph (a) or (c) of subdivision four of section\nthree hundred sixty-six of this title. Pending implementation of such\nautomated system, such commissioner shall, in consultation with the\noffice of temporary and disability assistance, undertake and continue\nefforts to educate local departments of social services about the\nmeasures they must take to ensure that medical assistance benefits are\nprovided to persons eligible for such benefits under subdivision four of\nsection three hundred sixty-six of this title.\n

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in New York?

Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.