Internal prototype — noindexed, not linked from public navigation yet.

N.Y. TCP Law § 113

This is the official text of N.Y. TCP Law § 113, part of New York’s TCP Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "TCP Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Examination of meters by agent

Official statutory text

§ 113. Examination of meters by agent. Any such corporation may make\nan agreement with any of its customers, by which any of its officers or\nagents shall be authorized at all reasonable times to enter any\ndwelling, store, building, room or place, supplied with steam by such\ncorporation and occupied by such customer, for the purpose of inspecting\nand examining the meters, devices, pipes, fittings and appliances for\nsupplying or regulating the supply of steam, and for ascertaining the\nquantity of steam consumed, or the quantity of water resulting from the\ncondensation of steam consumed. Every such agreement shall further\nprovide that such officer or agent shall exhibit his written authority\nif requested by the occupant of such dwelling, store, building, room or\nplace. Any person who shall directly or indirectly prevent or hinder\nsuch officer or agent from entering such dwelling, store, building, room\nor place, or from making such inspection or examination, in violation of\nsuch agreement, shall forfeit to the corporation the sum of twenty-five\ndollars for each offense.\n

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in New York?

Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.