N.Y. UCC Law § 3-507
This is the official text of N.Y. UCC Law § 3-507, part of New York’s UCC Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "UCC Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
Dishonor; Holder's Right of Recourse; Term Allowing Re-Presentment
Official statutory text
Section 3--507. Dishonor; Holder's Right of Recourse; Term Allowing\n Re-Presentment.\n (1) An instrument is dishonored when\n (a) a necessary or optional presentment is duly made and due\n acceptance or payment is refused or cannot be obtained within\n the prescribed time or in case of bank collections the\n instrument is seasonably returned by the midnight deadline\n (Section 4--301); or\n (b) presentment is excused and the instrument is not duly\n accepted or paid.\n (2) Subject to any necessary notice of dishonor and protest, the\nholder has upon dishonor an immediate right of recourse against the\ndrawers and indorsers.\n (3) Return of an instrument for lack of proper indorsement is not\ndishonor.\n (4) A term in a draft or an indorsement thereof allowing a stated time\nfor re-presentment in the event of any dishonor of the draft by\nnonacceptance if a time draft or by nonpayment if a sight draft gives\nthe holder as against any secondary party bound by the term an option to\nwaive the dishonor without affecting the liability of the secondary\nparty and he may present again up to the end of the stated time.\n
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in New York?
Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.