Internal prototype — noindexed, not linked from public navigation yet.

N.Y. WKC Law § 117

This is the official text of N.Y. WKC Law § 117, part of New York’s WKC Law — part of the compiled statutory law of New York, published by the state as "WKC Law." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.

Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.

Rules

Official statutory text

§ 117. Rules. 1. The board may adopt reasonable rules consistent with\nand supplemental to the provisions of this chapter and the labor law.\nThe chairman may make reasonable regulations consistent with the\nprovisions of this chapter and the labor law.\n 2. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the board\nshall, at least forty-five days prior to the adoption, amendment,\nsuspension or repeal of any rule or regulation of the board or of the\nchairman, give or cause to be given notice and offer any person or other\nagency an opportunity to present data, views or arguments, in accordance\nwith the provisions of subdivision one of section two hundred two of the\nstate administrative procedure act, providing, however, that the\ninadvertent failure to mail notice to any person or agency as provided\ntherein shall not invalidate any rule or regulation adopted thereunder.\nA proceeding to contest any rule on the grounds of noncompliance with\nthe procedural requirements of such subdivision must be commenced within\nfour months from the effective date of the rule or regulation.\n

Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site

Need a lawyer in New York?

Find a New York lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the Open US Law dataset (Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine (Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.