N.D. Cent. Code § 6-03-04.1
This is the official text of N.D. Cent. Code § 6-03-04.1, part of North Dakota’s Cent. Code — part of the compiled statutory law of North Dakota, published by the state as "Cent. Code." Browse the sections below, each linked to its official government source.
Not legal advice. This page reproduces the official text of a government statute for reference only. Laws change, and how a statute applies depends on your specific facts. For advice about your situation, consult a licensed attorney in your state.
6-03-04.1. Standard of conduct for directors of financial institutions
Official statutory text
6-03-04.1. Standard of conduct for directors of financial institutions
1. A director shall discharge the duties of the position of director in good faith, in a
manner the director reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the financial
institution, and with the care an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would
exercise under similar circumstances. A person who so performs those duties is not
liable by reason of being or having been a director of the financial institution.
2. A director is entitled to rely on information, opinions, reports, or statements, including
financial statements and other financial data, in each case prepared or presented by:
a. One or more officers or employees of the financial institution whom the director
reasonably believes to be reliable and competent in the matters presented;
b. Counsel, public accountants, or other persons as to matters the director
reasonably believes are within the person's professional or expert competence;
or
c. A committee of the board upon which the director does not serve, duly
established by the board as to matters within its designated authority, if the
director reasonably believes the committee to merit confidence.
3. Subsection 2 does not apply to a director who has specialized knowledge concerning
the matter in question that makes the reliance otherwise permitted by subsection 2
unwarranted.
4. A director who is present at a meeting of the board when an action is approved by the
affirmative vote of a majority of the directors present is presumed to have assented to
the action approved, unless the director:
a. Objects at the beginning of the meeting to the transaction of business because
the meeting is not lawfully called or convened and does not participate thereafter
in the meeting, in which case the director shall not be considered to be present at
the meeting for any purpose;
b. Votes against the action at the meeting; or
c. Is prohibited from voting on the action:
(1) By the articles;
(2) By the bylaws;
(3) As the result of a decision to approve, ratify, or authorize a transaction that
meets the standards and follows the process stated in section 10-19.1-51
for a business corporation; or
(4) By a conflict of interest policy adopted by the board.
5. A director's personal liability to the financial institution or its shareholders for monetary
damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director may be eliminated or limited in the
articles. The articles may not eliminate or limit the liability of a director:
a. For any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to the financial institution or its
shareholders;
b. For acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a
knowing violation of law;
c. For illegal distributions which a director who is present and not disqualified from
acting has voted for or failed to vote against;
d. For any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit;
or
e. For any act or omission occurring prior to the date when the provision in the
articles eliminating or limiting liability becomes effective.
6. In discharging the duties of the position of director, a director may, in considering the
best interests of the financial institution, consider the interests of the financial
institution's employees, customers, suppliers, and creditors; the economy of the state
and nation; community and societal considerations; and the long-term and short-term
interests of the financial institution and its shareholders, including the possibility these
interests may be best served by the continued independence of the financial
institution.
1. A director shall discharge the duties of the position of director in good faith, in a
manner the director reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the financial
institution, and with the care an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would
exercise under similar circumstances. A person who so performs those duties is not
liable by reason of being or having been a director of the financial institution.
2. A director is entitled to rely on information, opinions, reports, or statements, including
financial statements and other financial data, in each case prepared or presented by:
a. One or more officers or employees of the financial institution whom the director
reasonably believes to be reliable and competent in the matters presented;
b. Counsel, public accountants, or other persons as to matters the director
reasonably believes are within the person's professional or expert competence;
or
c. A committee of the board upon which the director does not serve, duly
established by the board as to matters within its designated authority, if the
director reasonably believes the committee to merit confidence.
3. Subsection 2 does not apply to a director who has specialized knowledge concerning
the matter in question that makes the reliance otherwise permitted by subsection 2
unwarranted.
4. A director who is present at a meeting of the board when an action is approved by the
affirmative vote of a majority of the directors present is presumed to have assented to
the action approved, unless the director:
a. Objects at the beginning of the meeting to the transaction of business because
the meeting is not lawfully called or convened and does not participate thereafter
in the meeting, in which case the director shall not be considered to be present at
the meeting for any purpose;
b. Votes against the action at the meeting; or
c. Is prohibited from voting on the action:
(1) By the articles;
(2) By the bylaws;
(3) As the result of a decision to approve, ratify, or authorize a transaction that
meets the standards and follows the process stated in section 10-19.1-51
for a business corporation; or
(4) By a conflict of interest policy adopted by the board.
5. A director's personal liability to the financial institution or its shareholders for monetary
damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director may be eliminated or limited in the
articles. The articles may not eliminate or limit the liability of a director:
a. For any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to the financial institution or its
shareholders;
b. For acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a
knowing violation of law;
c. For illegal distributions which a director who is present and not disqualified from
acting has voted for or failed to vote against;
d. For any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit;
or
e. For any act or omission occurring prior to the date when the provision in the
articles eliminating or limiting liability becomes effective.
6. In discharging the duties of the position of director, a director may, in considering the
best interests of the financial institution, consider the interests of the financial
institution's employees, customers, suppliers, and creditors; the economy of the state
and nation; community and societal considerations; and the long-term and short-term
interests of the financial institution and its shareholders, including the possibility these
interests may be best served by the continued independence of the financial
institution.
Status: in_force · Read it on the official government site
Need a lawyer in North Dakota?
Find a North Dakota lawyer
About this page: Statute text is reproduced from official government publishers via the
Open US Law dataset
(Vaquill AI, snapshot v2026.08, CC BY 4.0). Primary legislative text like this is public domain under the government-edicts doctrine
(Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). We link every section back to its official source so you can verify it independently.